Revision as of 09:15, 9 October 2014 by Yyeshmuk (Talk | contribs)


Frequency domain view of the relationship between a signal and a sampling of that signal

A slecture by ECE student Yerkebulan Yeshmukhanbetov

Partly based on the ECE438 Fall 2014 lecture material of Prof. Mireille Boutin.


Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. Derivation
  3. Example
  4. Conclusion

Introduction

$  X(f)  $ (the CTFT of $  x(t)  $  ),  $  X_s(f)  $ (the CTFT of $  x_s(t)  $ )  $  X_d(\omega)  $ (the DTFT of $  x_d[n]  $ )

Derivation

signal: $  x_s(t)  $ and $  x_d[n]  $. $  x_s(t)  $   $  P_T(t)  $ with the original signal $  x(t)  $ and actually $  x_s(t)  $  is  $  comb_T(x(t))  $ where T is the sampling period.

However the $ x_d[n] $ is $ x(nT) $ where T is the sampling period.

relationship between $  X(f)  $ and $  X_s(f)  $. 

We know that $ x_s(t) = x(t) \times P_T(t) $, we can derive the relationship between $ x_s(t) $ and $ x(t) $ in the following way:

$ \begin{align} F(comb_T(x(t)) &= F(x(t) \times P_T(t))\\ &= X(f)*F(P_T(t))\\ &= X(f)*\frac{1}{T}\sum_{n = -\infty}^\infty \delta(f-\frac{n}{T})\\ &= \frac{1}{T}X(f)*P_\frac{1}{T}(f)\\ &= \frac{1}{T}rep_\frac{1}{T}X(f)\\ \end{align} $

Show this relationship in graph below:


example

Xfcbt.png

Xsfcbt.png


Derivation

n $ X_s(f) $ and $ X_d(\omega) $

We know another way to express CTFT of $ x_s(t) $:

$ \begin{align} X_s(f) &= F(\sum_{n = -\infty}^\infty x(nT)\delta(t-nT))\\ &= \sum_{n = -\infty}^\infty x(nT)F(\delta(t-nT))\\ &= \sum_{n = -\infty}^\infty x(nT)e^{-j2\pi fnT}\\ \end{align} $

compare it with DTFT of $ x_d[n] $:

$ \begin{align} X_d(\omega) &= \sum_{n = -\infty}^\infty x_d[n]e^{-j\omega n}\\ &= \sum_{n = -\infty}^\infty x(nT)e^{-j\omega n}\\ \end{align} $

we can find that:

$ \begin{align} X_d(2\pi Tf) &= X_s(f)\\ \end{align} $

if $ f = \frac{1}{T} $

we have that:

$ \begin{align} X_d(2\pi ) &= X_s(\frac{1}{T})\\ \end{align} $

ationship between $ X_s(f) $ and $ X_d(\omega) $ and the is showed in graph as below:


example

Xsfcbt.png

Xdwcbt.png


conclusion

So the relationship between $ X(f) $ and $ X_s(f) $ is that $ X_s(f) $ is a a rep of $ X(f) $ in frequency domain with period of $ \frac{1}{T} $ and magnitude scaled by $ \frac{1}{T} $. the relationship between $ X(f) $ and $ X_d(\omega) $ is that $ X_d(\omega) $ is also a a rep of $ X(f) $ in frequency domain with period $ 2\pi $ and magnitude is also scaled by $ \frac{1}{T} $, but the frequency is scaled by $ 2\pi T $


Alumni Liaison

Abstract algebra continues the conceptual developments of linear algebra, on an even grander scale.

Dr. Paul Garrett