Revision as of 18:27, 24 September 2008 by Dfreidin (Talk)

Any body have any ideas???? I'm lost.


I don't know either. I looked in the back of the book, but I don't see how what they're saying has anything to do with the problem. The back of the book is talking about how $ \phi_{a^{n}}=1 $, but I thought that we basically needed to show that $ \phi_{a}^{n}=1 $. All I can show is that $ \phi_{a}^{n}=ax^{n}a^{-1} $, and that $ \phi_{a}^{n}=x $ if G is abelian.

Alumni Liaison

Correspondence Chess Grandmaster and Purdue Alumni

Prof. Dan Fleetwood