Revision as of 17:48, 6 October 2014 by Estockra (Talk | contribs)


Frequency domain view of the relationship between a signal and a sampling of that signal

A slecture by ECE student Evan Stockrahm

Partly based on the ECE438 Fall 2014 lecture material of Prof. Mireille Boutin.


Outline

  1. Introduction
  2. Derivation
  3. Example
  4. Conclusion

Introduction

This slecture will discuss the frequency domain view of the relationship between a signal, and a sampling of that signal. Essentially, given a signal x(t), we are going to take a look at the similarities and differences in X(f) and Xs(f). Xs(f) is the Fourier Transform of the sampling, xs(t), of x(t).


Derivation

Given an arbitrary signal x(t), its Fourier Transform is X(f)

The sampling of signal x(t), is the comb of x(t), which is equivalent to multiplying x(t) by the impulse train pT(t).

So, xs(t) = x(t) x pT(t) = combT(x(t))

F(xs(t)) = Xs(f) = (1/T) * rep1/T(X(f))

Analytically, we can see that the frequency domain view of the sampling's amplitude is scaled by a factor of 1/T. The shape of the frequency responses are the same, but it is repeated every 1/T in the sampling's frequency response.

<span style="line-height: 1.5em;" />

<span style="line-height: 1.5em;" />


example

x(t) = cos(wot)                                                                      X(f) = pi*(delta(w-wo) + delta(w+wo))
                                                                                                   = 1/2*(delta(f - fo) + delta(f + fo))

xs(t) = cos(wot) * pT(t)                                                          Xs(f) = (1/T)*rep1/T(1/2*(delta(f - fo) + delta(f + fo)))
        = combT(cos(wot))



Derivation

Then we are going to findetween Xs(f) and

Xd(ω) and the relationship is showed in graph as below:


example


fd


conclusion

So tT


Alumni Liaison

has a message for current ECE438 students.

Sean Hu, ECE PhD 2009