(Created page with "Category:ECE Category:QE Category:CE Category:problem solving Category:algorithms <center> <font size= 4> ECE_PhD_Qualifying_Exams|ECE Ph.D. Qualifying...")
 
 
Line 23: Line 23:
 
This result is not particularly notable, since all it shows is that the 3-CNF problem is reducible to the clique problem in polynomial time. It is well known that both of these problems are NP-complete, and it is even the case that the professor's proof is commonly used to show that the clique problem is NP-complete. See Cormen's <math>Introduction\,to\,Algorithms</math>, section 34.5 for an example of this.
 
This result is not particularly notable, since all it shows is that the 3-CNF problem is reducible to the clique problem in polynomial time. It is well known that both of these problems are NP-complete, and it is even the case that the professor's proof is commonly used to show that the clique problem is NP-complete. See Cormen's <math>Introduction\,to\,Algorithms</math>, section 34.5 for an example of this.
  
[[ECE-QE_CE2-2015|Back to QE CE question 2, August 2015]]
+
[[ECE-QE_CE1-2015|Back to QE CE question 2, August 2015]]
  
 
[[ECE_PhD_Qualifying_Exams|Back to ECE Qualifying Exams (QE) page]]
 
[[ECE_PhD_Qualifying_Exams|Back to ECE Qualifying Exams (QE) page]]

Latest revision as of 20:43, 7 March 2016


ECE Ph.D. Qualifying Exam

Computer Engineering(CE)

Question 1: Algorithms

August 2015


Solution 1

This result is not particularly notable, since all it shows is that the 3-CNF problem is reducible to the clique problem in polynomial time. It is well known that both of these problems are NP-complete, and it is even the case that the professor's proof is commonly used to show that the clique problem is NP-complete. See Cormen's $ Introduction\,to\,Algorithms $, section 34.5 for an example of this.

Back to QE CE question 2, August 2015

Back to ECE Qualifying Exams (QE) page

Alumni Liaison

Basic linear algebra uncovers and clarifies very important geometry and algebra.

Dr. Paul Garrett