Line 30: Line 30:
 
== Useful Background  ==
 
== Useful Background  ==
  
Nyquist Condition: <math>f_s = 2f_{max}</math></font>
+
Nyquist Condition: <math>f_s = 2f_{max}</math> <br />
 
DTFT of a Cosine: <font size="2"><math>x_d[n] = cos(2\pi nT){\leftrightarrow}X(\omega) = \pi(\delta(\omega-\omega_o) + \delta(\omega+\omega_o)){ ,for\ } \omega \in [-\pi,\pi]</math></font>
 
DTFT of a Cosine: <font size="2"><math>x_d[n] = cos(2\pi nT){\leftrightarrow}X(\omega) = \pi(\delta(\omega-\omega_o) + \delta(\omega+\omega_o)){ ,for\ } \omega \in [-\pi,\pi]</math></font>
  
Line 39: Line 39:
  
 
For our original pure frequency, let’s choose the E below middle C. The E occurs at 330''Hz'' <p><span class="math"><em>x</em>(<em>t</em>) = <em>c</em><em>o</em><em>s</em>(2<em>π</em> * 330<em>t</em>)</span><br /></p>
 
For our original pure frequency, let’s choose the E below middle C. The E occurs at 330''Hz'' <p><span class="math"><em>x</em>(<em>t</em>) = <em>c</em><em>o</em><em>s</em>(2<em>π</em> * 330<em>t</em>)</span><br /></p>
<p>Now let’s sample this pure cosine at a frequency above the Nyquist Rate. The Nyquist Rate is: <br><span class="math">&nbsp;''f''<sub>''s''</sub> = 2 * ''f''<sub>''m''''a''''x''</sub> = 2 * (330''Hz'') = 660''Hz''</span>. Let’s sample at 990<span class="math">''Hz''</span>.  
+
<p>Now let’s sample this pure cosine at a frequency above the Nyquist Rate. The Nyquist Rate is: <br><span class="math">&nbsp;''f''<sub>''s''</sub> = 2 * ''f''<sub>''max''</sub> = 2 * (330''Hz'') = 660''Hz''</span>. Let’s sample at 990<span class="math">''Hz''</span>.  
  
 
<math> \begin{align} \\  
 
<math> \begin{align} \\  
Line 93: Line 93:
 
== Conclusion ==
 
== Conclusion ==
  
Looking at Figure 3, you can see the comparison between a cosine sampled above and below the Nyquist Rate. The cosine sampled below the Nyquist Rate exhibits aliasing, which in this case causes a frequency shift and a magnitude scaling of the original frequency response.  
+
The DTFT of a sampled signal is always periodic with <math>2\pi</math>. So even though the DTFT of a signal sampled below Nyquist may initially not fall within <math>[-\pi,\pi]</math>, it can be extrapolated to the window you are interested in. In my derivation, I chose to shift the cosine before the DTFT. Looking at Figure 3, you can see the comparison between a cosine sampled above and below the Nyquist Rate. The cosine sampled below the Nyquist Rate exhibits aliasing. The aliased signal has a decreased magnitude compared to the original. The aliased signal also is at a different frequency.
  
 
----
 
----

Revision as of 16:47, 2 October 2014

Link title

DTFT of a Cosine Sampled Above and Below the Nyquist Rate

A slecture by ECE student Sahil Sanghani

Partly based on the ECE438 Fall 2014 lecture material of Prof. Mireille Boutin.


Outline

  • Introduction
  • Useful Background
  • DTFT Example of a Cosine Sampled Above the Nyquist Rate
  • DTFT Example of a Cosine Sampled Below the Nyquist Rate
  • Conclusion
  • References


Introduction

In this Slecture, I will walk you through taking the DTFT of a pure frequency sampled above and below the Nyquist Rate. Then I will compare the differences between them.


Useful Background

Nyquist Condition: $ f_s = 2f_{max} $
DTFT of a Cosine: $ x_d[n] = cos(2\pi nT){\leftrightarrow}X(\omega) = \pi(\delta(\omega-\omega_o) + \delta(\omega+\omega_o)){ ,for\ } \omega \in [-\pi,\pi] $

The DTFT of a sampled signal is periodic with .


DTFT of a Cosine Sampled Above the Nyquist Rate

For our original pure frequency, let’s choose the E below middle C. The E occurs at 330Hz

x(t) = cos(2π * 330t)

Now let’s sample this pure cosine at a frequency above the Nyquist Rate. The Nyquist Rate is:
 fs = 2 * fmax = 2 * (330Hz) = 660Hz. Let’s sample at 990Hz. $ \begin{align} \\ x_d[n] & = x(n*\frac{1}{990Hz})\\ & = cos(2\pi n *\frac{330}{990}) = \frac{e^{j2\pi n \frac{330}{990}} + e^{-j2\pi n \frac{330}{990}}}{2}\\ & = cos(\frac{2\pi n}{3}) \end{align} $
Because $ \left | \frac{2\pi}{3}\right | < \pi $, there is no aliasing occurring in the DTFT, and it can be written as follows: $ \begin{align} \\ X(\omega) & = \frac{1}{2}(2\pi\delta(\omega - 2\pi \frac{330}{990}) + 2\pi\delta(\omega + 2\pi \frac{330}{990})) , \ \omega \in\ [-\pi,\pi]\\ & = \frac{990}{2}(\delta(\frac{990}{2\pi}\omega - 330) + \delta(\frac{990}{2\pi}\omega + 330)) , \ \omega \in\ [-\pi,\pi]\\ & = rep_{2\pi}(\frac{990}{2}(\delta(\frac{990}{2\pi}\omega - 330) + \delta(\frac{990}{2\pi}\omega + 330))), \forall \omega \end{align} $ AboveNyquist.jpg


DTFT Of a Cosine Sampled Below the Nyquist Rate

Let’s use the same pure frequency as above.

x(t) = cos(2π * 330t)

Now let’s sample this pure cosine at a frequency below the Nyquist Rate. From above, the Nyquist Rate is 660Hz. Let’s sample at 550Hz.


$ \begin{align} \\ x_d[n] & = x(n*\frac{1}{550Hz})\\ & = cos(2\pi n *\frac{330}{550}) = \frac{e^{j2\pi n \frac{330}{550}} + e^{-j2\pi n \frac{330}{550}}}{2}\\ \\ \end{align} $

Because $ \pi < \frac{2\pi 330}{550} < 2\pi $, aliasing occurs in the DTFT. The DTFT should be calculated with ω ∈ [ − π, π], so we will use the periodicity of cosine to shift $ x_d[n] $ into an appropriate range.
>$ \begin{align}\\ x_{d}[n] & = cos(2\pi n*\frac{330}{550})\\ & = cos(2\pi n*\frac{330}{550} - 2\pi n)\\ & = cos(2\pi n*(\frac{330}{550} - \frac{550}{550}))\\ & = cos(2\pi n*(\frac{-220}{550}))\\ & = cos(2\pi n*\frac{220Hz}{550Hz}) \end{align} $

Now that the argument of the cosine $ \left | 2\pi \frac{220}{550}\right | < \pi $, we can take the DTFT of xd[n], and the initial value will fall into a desired range for ω.


$ \begin{align} X(\omega) & = \frac{1}{2}(2\pi\delta(\omega - 2\pi \frac{220}{550}) + 2\pi\delta(\omega + 2\pi \frac{220}{550})) , \ \omega \in\ [-\pi,\pi]\\ & = \frac{550}{2}(\delta(\frac{550}{2\pi}\omega - 220) + \delta(\frac{550}{2\pi}\omega + 220)) , \ \omega \in\ [-\pi,\pi]\\ & = rep_{2\pi}(\frac{550}{2}(\delta(\frac{550}{2\pi}\omega - 220) + \delta(\frac{550}{2\pi}\omega + 220))), \forall \omega \end{align} $

BelowNyquist.jpg


Conclusion

The DTFT of a sampled signal is always periodic with $ 2\pi $. So even though the DTFT of a signal sampled below Nyquist may initially not fall within $ [-\pi,\pi] $, it can be extrapolated to the window you are interested in. In my derivation, I chose to shift the cosine before the DTFT. Looking at Figure 3, you can see the comparison between a cosine sampled above and below the Nyquist Rate. The cosine sampled below the Nyquist Rate exhibits aliasing. The aliased signal has a decreased magnitude compared to the original. The aliased signal also is at a different frequency.


References

[1] Mireille Boutin, "ECE 438 Digital Signal Processing with Applications," Purdue University. September 9, 2014.

Back to ECE438, Fall 2014

Alumni Liaison

Prof. Math. Ohio State and Associate Dean
Outstanding Alumnus Purdue Math 2008

Jeff McNeal