Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Discussion area for final exam practice problems== | ==Discussion area for final exam practice problems== | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
On problem 2, I noticed that in matrix form, both i and ii had one column that had a common multiple (1 for the 3rd column of i and 3 for the 3rd column of ii). Is that a quick way to see that they are not independent or does that not always hold true? I can quickly see that i has a det of 0 and calculated ii to get the same - I was just wondering if there's a quicker way? Thanks, [[User:Tlouvar|Tlouvar]] | On problem 2, I noticed that in matrix form, both i and ii had one column that had a common multiple (1 for the 3rd column of i and 3 for the 3rd column of ii). Is that a quick way to see that they are not independent or does that not always hold true? I can quickly see that i has a det of 0 and calculated ii to get the same - I was just wondering if there's a quicker way? Thanks, [[User:Tlouvar|Tlouvar]] | ||
Line 15: | Line 9: | ||
Is there a place in the book that talks about #20 in the practice problems? It wasn't obvious to me how to calculate the coefficient and was seeing if there was a place I could read up on it. | Is there a place in the book that talks about #20 in the practice problems? It wasn't obvious to me how to calculate the coefficient and was seeing if there was a place I could read up on it. | ||
+ | From [[User:Bell|Steve Bell]]: I mentioned in my last review that there won't be any questions | ||
+ | about complex Fourier Series on the Final Exam. There might, however, be | ||
+ | questions about the complex Fourier TRANSFORM. | ||
---- | ---- |
Revision as of 11:10, 9 December 2013
Discussion area for final exam practice problems
On problem 2, I noticed that in matrix form, both i and ii had one column that had a common multiple (1 for the 3rd column of i and 3 for the 3rd column of ii). Is that a quick way to see that they are not independent or does that not always hold true? I can quickly see that i has a det of 0 and calculated ii to get the same - I was just wondering if there's a quicker way? Thanks, Tlouvar
Nevermind. I changed the 7 to an 8 on ii and did not get a zero determinant, so I've answered my own question above. Tlouvar
Is there a place in the book that talks about #20 in the practice problems? It wasn't obvious to me how to calculate the coefficient and was seeing if there was a place I could read up on it.
From Steve Bell: I mentioned in my last review that there won't be any questions about complex Fourier Series on the Final Exam. There might, however, be questions about the complex Fourier TRANSFORM.