| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I could be mistaken, but I think question #1 should read "if y is an eigenvector of 'A' , show that x = Py are eigenvectors of A". Theorem 3 on p. 340 says that "if x is an eigenvector of A, then y = P<sup>-1</sup>x is an eigenvector of 'A' corresponding to the same eigenvalue". If that is the case, x = Py, and the only calculation you need to do on P is to find P<sup>-1</sup> for 'A' = P<sup>-1</sup>AP. --[[User:Asauseda|Andrew Sauseda]] 23:22, 9 September 2013 (UTC)<br> | I could be mistaken, but I think question #1 should read "if y is an eigenvector of 'A' , show that x = Py are eigenvectors of A". Theorem 3 on p. 340 says that "if x is an eigenvector of A, then y = P<sup>-1</sup>x is an eigenvector of 'A' corresponding to the same eigenvalue". If that is the case, x = Py, and the only calculation you need to do on P is to find P<sup>-1</sup> for 'A' = P<sup>-1</sup>AP. --[[User:Asauseda|Andrew Sauseda]] 23:22, 9 September 2013 (UTC)<br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | from [[User:Jayling|James Ayling]]: I agree with you Andrew | ||
Revision as of 19:04, 9 September 2013
Question from Ryan Russon
Ok, what in the world are we supposed to do with p. 345 #1? From what I gather, The problem asks us to find the eigenvectors of this matrix P, A (the given matrix), and then some new 'A' where A = P-1AP and show that x = Py, where y is an eigenvector of P and x is an eigenvector of both A and this new A. The eigenvalues of P are really crummy... are we allowed to use a calculator or MATLAB or something to help us with this one? Maybe I am just over-complicating this problem... HELP!
I could be mistaken, but I think question #1 should read "if y is an eigenvector of 'A' , show that x = Py are eigenvectors of A". Theorem 3 on p. 340 says that "if x is an eigenvector of A, then y = P-1x is an eigenvector of 'A' corresponding to the same eigenvalue". If that is the case, x = Py, and the only calculation you need to do on P is to find P-1 for 'A' = P-1AP. --Andrew Sauseda 23:22, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
from James Ayling: I agree with you Andrew
