Line 54: Line 54:
 
: advantages: more stable, less sensitive to noise;
 
: advantages: more stable, less sensitive to noise;
 
: disadvantages: need <math>2(2N+1)^2</math> multiplies per output point, so it needs more computation.
 
: disadvantages: need <math>2(2N+1)^2</math> multiplies per output point, so it needs more computation.
 +
 +
== Solution From Another Student: ==
 +
 +
a)<br \>
 +
<math>
 +
h_1(m,n) = \sum\limits_{j =  - N}^N {{a_j}\delta(m,n - j)}
 +
</math>
 +
 +
b)<br \>
 +
<math>
 +
h_2(m,n) = \sum\limits_{i =  - N}^N {{b_i}\delta(m-i,n)}
 +
</math>
 +
 +
c)<br \>
 +
<math>
 +
h(m,n) = \sum\limits_{i =  - N}^N {\sum\limits_{j =  - N}^N {{b_i}{a_j}\delta (m - i,n - j)} }
 +
</math>
 +
 +
d)
 +
<math> 2N+1 </math> multiplies for each of the two individual systems <br \>
 +
<math>(2N+1)^2</math> multiplies for the complete system with a single convolution
 +
 +
e) Implement in sequence:
 +
: Advantage: Less multiplies, faster
 +
: Disadvantage: Need space for intermediate result
 +
 +
Implement a complete system:
 +
: Advantage: Intuitive solution. No intermediate result
 +
: Disadvantage: More multiplies, slower
 +
 
----
 
----
 
[[ECE_PhD_Qualifying_Exams|Back to ECE QE page]]:
 
[[ECE_PhD_Qualifying_Exams|Back to ECE QE page]]:

Revision as of 18:07, 18 March 2013

ECE Ph.D. Qualifying Exam: CS-5 (637)

Problem 1 , 2

Problem 2

Consider the following 2-D LSI systems. The first system has input $ x(m,n) $ and output $ y(m,n) $, and the second system has input $ y(m,n) $ and output $ z(m,n) $. $ y(m,n) = \sum\limits_{j = - N}^N {{a_j}x(m,n - j)} \quad\quad S1 $
$ z(m,n) = \sum\limits_{i = - N}^N {{b_i}y(m-i,n)} \quad\quad S2 $

a) Calculate the 2-D impulse response, $ h_1(m,n) $, of the first system.

b) Calculate the 2-D impulse response, $ h_2(m,n) $, of the second system.

c) Calculate the 2-D impulse response, $ h(m,n) $, of the complete system.

d) How many multiplies does it take per output point to implement each of the two individual systems? How, many multiplies does it take per output point to implements the complete system with a single convolution.

e) Explain the advantages and disadvantages of implementing the two systems in sequence versus a single complete system.

Solution:

a)
$ h_1(m,n) = \sum\limits_{j = - N}^N {{a_j}\delta(m,n - j)} $

b)
$ h_2(m,n) = \sum\limits_{i = - N}^N {{b_i}\delta(m-i,n)} $

c)
$ \begin{align} h(m,n) &= {h_1}(m,n)*{h_2}(m,n)\\ &= (\sum\limits_{j = - N}^N {{a_j}\delta(m,n - j)}) * (\sum\limits_{i = - N}^N {{b_i}\delta(m-i,n)})\\ &= \sum\limits_{j = - N}^N {\sum\limits_{i = - N}^N {{a_j}{b_i}\delta (m - i,n - j)} } \end{align} $

d)
S1: need 2N+1 multiplies
S2: need 2N+1 multiplies
To implement the complete system with a single convolution: filter $ h(m,n) $ is a $ (2N+1)\times(2N+1) $ filter, and for each location we need 2 multiplies, so in total, we need $ 2(2N+1)^2 $ multiplies.

e) Two systems in sequence:

advantages: need $ (2N+1)^2 $ multiplies per output point, so it is computationally better;
disadvantages: as there are two systems, may introduce more noise.

A single complete system:

advantages: more stable, less sensitive to noise;
disadvantages: need $ 2(2N+1)^2 $ multiplies per output point, so it needs more computation.

Solution From Another Student:

a)
$ h_1(m,n) = \sum\limits_{j = - N}^N {{a_j}\delta(m,n - j)} $

b)
$ h_2(m,n) = \sum\limits_{i = - N}^N {{b_i}\delta(m-i,n)} $

c)
$ h(m,n) = \sum\limits_{i = - N}^N {\sum\limits_{j = - N}^N {{b_i}{a_j}\delta (m - i,n - j)} } $

d) $ 2N+1 $ multiplies for each of the two individual systems
$ (2N+1)^2 $ multiplies for the complete system with a single convolution

e) Implement in sequence:

Advantage: Less multiplies, faster
Disadvantage: Need space for intermediate result

Implement a complete system:

Advantage: Intuitive solution. No intermediate result
Disadvantage: More multiplies, slower

Back to ECE QE page:

Alumni Liaison

Followed her dream after having raised her family.

Ruth Enoch, PhD Mathematics