Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
--[[User:Xiao1|Xiao1]] 23:40, 12 November 2011 (UTC) | --[[User:Xiao1|Xiao1]] 23:40, 12 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :<span style="color:green">Instructor's comment: Before you use the second approach on the exam, make sure that the separability property is in the table. Otherwise, you must prove the property before using it. (But of course, proving that property is triviale.) -pm </span> | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | :<span style="color:orange">Instructor's challenge: Can somebody answer this using duality? -pm </span> | ||
+ | ---- | ||
===Answer 2=== | ===Answer 2=== | ||
Write it here | Write it here |
Revision as of 05:51, 14 November 2011
Contents
Continuous-space Fourier transform of the 2D "sinc" function (Practice Problem)
Compute the Continuous-space Fourier transform (CSFT) of
$ f(x,y)= \frac{\sin \pi x}{ \pi x}\frac{\sin \pi y }{\pi y}. $
(Justify all your steps.)
You will receive feedback from your instructor and TA directly on this page. Other students are welcome to comment/discuss/point out mistakes/ask questions too!
Answer 1
Claim that $ CSFT \{\frac{\sin \pi x}{ \pi x}\frac{\sin \pi y }{\pi y}\} = rect(u,v)= rect(u)rect(v) $
Proof:
$ iCSFT\{rect(u)rect(v)\} = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}rect(u)rect(v)e^{2j \pi (ux +vy) }dudv $
$ =\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}rect(u)e^{2j \pi (ux) }du \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}rect(v)e^{2j \pi (vy) }dv $
$ = \int_{-\frac{1}{2}}^{\frac{1}{2}}e^{2j \pi (ux) }du \int_{-\frac{1}{2}}^{\frac{1}{2}}e^{2j \pi (vy) }dv $
$ = \frac{(e^{j \pi x}-e^{-j \pi x} )(e^{j \pi y}-e^{-j \pi y})}{(2j\pi x)(2j\pi y)} $
$ = \frac{sin(x)sin(y)}{(\pi x)(\pi y)} = sinc(x)sinc(y)= sinc(x,y) $
Another way is to show by "separality", since
$ f(x,y)=g(x)h(y),g(x) = sinc(x),h(y) = sinc(y) $
then $ F(u,v)=G(u)H(v),G(u) = CTFT(f(x)),H(v) = CTFT(h(y)) $
by CTFT pairs, $ G(u) = rect(u),H(v) = rect(v) $
which shows $ CSFT \{ sinc(x,y) \} = rect(u)rect(v) = rect(u,v) $,
as the same above.
--Xiao1 23:40, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
- Instructor's comment: Before you use the second approach on the exam, make sure that the separability property is in the table. Otherwise, you must prove the property before using it. (But of course, proving that property is triviale.) -pm
- Instructor's challenge: Can somebody answer this using duality? -pm
Answer 2
Write it here
Answer 3
Write it here.