| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Got 1 and 2 in class. I was thinking about number 3, and got into this line of thinking. We don't know that the metric is surjective to <math>\mathbf{R}</math>, so say the metric mapped to <math>\mathbf{Q}</math>. Then certainly it could be the case that there was even a point in <math>X</math>, let alone <math>K</math>, where <math>d(x,k) \inf bla</math>. [[User:Dimberti|Dimberti]] 15:55, 21 September 2008 (UTC) | Got 1 and 2 in class. I was thinking about number 3, and got into this line of thinking. We don't know that the metric is surjective to <math>\mathbf{R}</math>, so say the metric mapped to <math>\mathbf{Q}</math>. Then certainly it could be the case that there was even a point in <math>X</math>, let alone <math>K</math>, where <math>d(x,k) \inf bla</math>. [[User:Dimberti|Dimberti]] 15:55, 21 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
:Ah, but then, just like in the discrete metric, the only compact sets would be finite ones. Nevermind. [[User:Dimberti|Dimberti]] 15:56, 21 September 2008 (UTC) | :Ah, but then, just like in the discrete metric, the only compact sets would be finite ones. Nevermind. [[User:Dimberti|Dimberti]] 15:56, 21 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | O.k., here was the line of thought I was going on, but am dubious about its success. | ||
| + | |||
| + | i) Make the argument that with the infimum you can construct a sequence that approaches it. | ||
| + | ii) I'm sure there's a theorem somewhere that states that point of a limit implies limit point. | ||
| + | iii) K is compact so it's closed. | ||
| + | iv) Since it's closed, the limit point is in K. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The problem I have with this is that I'm kind of meta-reading the question, so it makes the next part trivial. [[User:Dimberti|Dimberti]] 16:06, 21 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:06, 21 September 2008
Got 1 and 2 in class. I was thinking about number 3, and got into this line of thinking. We don't know that the metric is surjective to $ \mathbf{R} $, so say the metric mapped to $ \mathbf{Q} $. Then certainly it could be the case that there was even a point in $ X $, let alone $ K $, where $ d(x,k) \inf bla $. Dimberti 15:55, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
- Ah, but then, just like in the discrete metric, the only compact sets would be finite ones. Nevermind. Dimberti 15:56, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
O.k., here was the line of thought I was going on, but am dubious about its success.
i) Make the argument that with the infimum you can construct a sequence that approaches it. ii) I'm sure there's a theorem somewhere that states that point of a limit implies limit point. iii) K is compact so it's closed. iv) Since it's closed, the limit point is in K.
The problem I have with this is that I'm kind of meta-reading the question, so it makes the next part trivial. Dimberti 16:06, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
