Line 1: Line 1:
 
Has anyone found a method for counting the number of subgraphs of W3 without actually drawing out every graph and counting them?<br> --[[User:Aoser|Aoser]] 16:51, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
 
Has anyone found a method for counting the number of subgraphs of W3 without actually drawing out every graph and counting them?<br> --[[User:Aoser|Aoser]] 16:51, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
  
--
+
----
 
Yep, I found. Build the adjacency matrix for W3.<br> 1) Consider (# ways to choose i vertices), where i=1,2,3,4.<br> 2) Also consider # places for edges in each configuration (with 1, 2, 3, 4 vertices) - build the edge or not (2 choices).<br> Combine these using product & sum rules.<br> Hope it helps<br>--[[User:Asuleime|Asuleime]] 22:45, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
 
Yep, I found. Build the adjacency matrix for W3.<br> 1) Consider (# ways to choose i vertices), where i=1,2,3,4.<br> 2) Also consider # places for edges in each configuration (with 1, 2, 3, 4 vertices) - build the edge or not (2 choices).<br> Combine these using product & sum rules.<br> Hope it helps<br>--[[User:Asuleime|Asuleime]] 22:45, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:48, 5 November 2008

Has anyone found a method for counting the number of subgraphs of W3 without actually drawing out every graph and counting them?
--Aoser 16:51, 3 November 2008 (UTC)


Yep, I found. Build the adjacency matrix for W3.
1) Consider (# ways to choose i vertices), where i=1,2,3,4.
2) Also consider # places for edges in each configuration (with 1, 2, 3, 4 vertices) - build the edge or not (2 choices).
Combine these using product & sum rules.
Hope it helps
--Asuleime 22:45, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Alumni Liaison

Abstract algebra continues the conceptual developments of linear algebra, on an even grander scale.

Dr. Paul Garrett