Line 10: Line 10:
 
Maybe a stupid question but should we prove if a=b then (a+c)=(b+c) if we want to use this property? Can't find where it is given in the book.
 
Maybe a stupid question but should we prove if a=b then (a+c)=(b+c) if we want to use this property? Can't find where it is given in the book.
  
Dr. Alekseenko: Apparently, this equation a consequence of
+
Dr. Alekseenko (corrected 01/26/2010 7:20pm): Indeed, the book does not seem to have this statement in it proved.
  
<math> (a+c)-(b+c) = </math>  
+
First of all, let us establish that <math> -(b+c)=(-b)+(-c)</math>. Indeed,
 +
consider:
 +
<math> -(b+c) = \mathrm{axiom\ of\ zero\ ele.}\ } -(b+c)+ 0 + 0 = </math>
 +
Use the axiom of additive inverse:
 +
<math> = -(b+c) + b + (-b) + c + (-c)  = </math>
 +
Use commutative law on terms #3 and #4:
 +
<math> = -(b+c) + b + c+ (-b) + (-c)  = </math>
 +
Use associative law:
 +
<math> = -(b+c) + (b + c)+ (-b) + (-c)  = </math>
 +
Finally, use axiom of inverse (A4) on terms #1 and #2:
 +
<math> =  0 + (-b) + (-c)  = </math>
 +
and the axiom of zero:
 +
<math> =  (-b) + (-c)  = </math>
  
use associative law
+
Now consider
 +
<math> (a+c) + (-(b+c)) = </math>
 +
Use the above identity:
 +
<math> = a + c + ((-b) + (-c)) =</math>
 +
and the associative property
 +
<math> = a + c + (- b) + (-c) =</math>
 +
and the commutative property on terms #2 and #3:
 +
<math> = a + (- b) + c + (-c) =</math>
 +
Use the additive inverse property (A4):
 +
<math> = a + (- b) + 0 =</math>
 +
and the zero element property:
 +
<math> = a + (- b)</math>
 +
  
<math> a + (c - b) + c =</math>
+
Now if <math> a=b </math> then <math> a + (-b) = b + (- b)=0 </math>
  
use commutative law
 
  
<math> a + (b + (-c)) + c =</math>
 
  
 
next associative law, again,  
 
next associative law, again,  
  
<math> a + b + ((-c) + c) =</math>
+
<math> a - b + ((-c) + c) =</math>
  
 
finally use axiom of zero, i.e.,  <math> (-c)+c =0 </math> we obtain
 
finally use axiom of zero, i.e.,  <math> (-c)+c =0 </math> we obtain

Revision as of 14:30, 26 January 2010

To ask a new question, add a line and type in your question. You can use LaTeX to type math. Here is a link to a short LaTeX tutorial.


To answer a question, open the page for editing and start typing below the question...

go back to the Discussion Page


Maybe a stupid question but should we prove if a=b then (a+c)=(b+c) if we want to use this property? Can't find where it is given in the book.

Dr. Alekseenko (corrected 01/26/2010 7:20pm): Indeed, the book does not seem to have this statement in it proved.

First of all, let us establish that $ -(b+c)=(-b)+(-c) $. Indeed, consider: $ -(b+c) = \mathrm{axiom\ of\ zero\ ele.}\ } -(b+c)+ 0 + 0 = $ Use the axiom of additive inverse: $ = -(b+c) + b + (-b) + c + (-c) = $ Use commutative law on terms #3 and #4: $ = -(b+c) + b + c+ (-b) + (-c) = $ Use associative law: $ = -(b+c) + (b + c)+ (-b) + (-c) = $ Finally, use axiom of inverse (A4) on terms #1 and #2: $ = 0 + (-b) + (-c) = $ and the axiom of zero: $ = (-b) + (-c) = $

Now consider $ (a+c) + (-(b+c)) = $ Use the above identity: $ = a + c + ((-b) + (-c)) = $ and the associative property $ = a + c + (- b) + (-c) = $ and the commutative property on terms #2 and #3: $ = a + (- b) + c + (-c) = $ Use the additive inverse property (A4): $ = a + (- b) + 0 = $ and the zero element property: $ = a + (- b) $


Now if $ a=b $ then $ a + (-b) = b + (- b)=0 $


next associative law, again,

$ a - b + ((-c) + c) = $

finally use axiom of zero, i.e., $ (-c)+c =0 $ we obtain

$ a + b + 0 $

then, again by the zero axiom

$ a + b $

Since we have just established it, you do not need to prove it in your homework.

(but you have to put a reference to this proof).

Alumni Liaison

Correspondence Chess Grandmaster and Purdue Alumni

Prof. Dan Fleetwood