| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
For example, for Question 1, I obtained the Fourier transform in terms of the general zeros and poles, and then replaced, say z1 by r1.exp(jw1), where r1 and w1 are constants. | For example, for Question 1, I obtained the Fourier transform in terms of the general zeros and poles, and then replaced, say z1 by r1.exp(jw1), where r1 and w1 are constants. | ||
| − | Now, for an approximate plot, do I fix r1 and w1, as the values that correspond to the approximate location of the zero/pole | + | Now, for an approximate plot, do I fix r1 and w1, as the values that correspond to the approximate location of the zero/pole or do I let them remain general. |
| + | for example for (a) the location of the upper zero would be something like (0.6)exp(j(pi/3))), | ||
Basically, it's a mean looking function, and for an approximate plot, I was tempted to use MATLAB to plot it. Can I do that? | Basically, it's a mean looking function, and for an approximate plot, I was tempted to use MATLAB to plot it. Can I do that? | ||
--Dlamba | --Dlamba | ||
Revision as of 18:44, 11 September 2009
- You might want to review the following pages before doing the homework. Do you see any mistake/misleading statements in them? --Mboutin 09:24, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
--Back to ECE438 (BoutinFall2009)
- Hi,can we use MATLAB for the homework?
For example, for Question 1, I obtained the Fourier transform in terms of the general zeros and poles, and then replaced, say z1 by r1.exp(jw1), where r1 and w1 are constants.
Now, for an approximate plot, do I fix r1 and w1, as the values that correspond to the approximate location of the zero/pole or do I let them remain general. for example for (a) the location of the upper zero would be something like (0.6)exp(j(pi/3))),
Basically, it's a mean looking function, and for an approximate plot, I was tempted to use MATLAB to plot it. Can I do that? --Dlamba
