Line 12: Line 12:
 
== Theorems ==
 
== Theorems ==
 
=== Element commutes with inverse ===
 
=== Element commutes with inverse ===
Thm: <math>\forall a\in G</math>  <math>a\cdot a^{-1} = a^{-1}\cdot a = 1</math>
+
Thm: Let <math>\langle G, \cdot \rangle</math> be a group.  Then <math>\forall a\in G</math>  <math>a\cdot a^{-1} = a^{-1}\cdot a = 1</math>
  
 
Prf: Let <math>a</math> be an arbitrary element of <math>G</math>.  Since <math>a^{-1}\in G</math>, it has an inverse <math>(a^{-1})^{-1}</math> in <math>G</math> such that <math>(a^{-1})^{-1}\cdot a^{-1} = 1</math> by the inverse axiom.  But <math>1\cdot a^{-1} = a^{-1}</math> by the identity axiom, so substituting into the previous equation: <math>(a^{-1})^{-1}\cdot (1\cdot a^{-1}) = 1</math>.  But by the inverse axiom, <math>1 = a^{-1}\cdot a</math>, so substituting again: <math>(a^{-1})^{-1}((a^{-1}\cdot a)\cdot a^{-1}) = 1</math> and by associativity <math>((a^{-1})^{-1}\cdot a^{-1})\cdot(a\cdot a^{-1}) = 1</math>.  But <math>((a^{-1})^{-1}\cdot a^{-1}) = 1</math> and <math>1\cdot(a\cdot a^{-1}) = a\cdot a^{-1}</math>, so <math>a\cdot a^{-1} = 1</math>.  Since <math>a^{-1}\cdot a = 1</math> is given by the inverse axiom, <math>a\cdot a^{-1} = a^{-1}\cdot a = 1</math>.
 
Prf: Let <math>a</math> be an arbitrary element of <math>G</math>.  Since <math>a^{-1}\in G</math>, it has an inverse <math>(a^{-1})^{-1}</math> in <math>G</math> such that <math>(a^{-1})^{-1}\cdot a^{-1} = 1</math> by the inverse axiom.  But <math>1\cdot a^{-1} = a^{-1}</math> by the identity axiom, so substituting into the previous equation: <math>(a^{-1})^{-1}\cdot (1\cdot a^{-1}) = 1</math>.  But by the inverse axiom, <math>1 = a^{-1}\cdot a</math>, so substituting again: <math>(a^{-1})^{-1}((a^{-1}\cdot a)\cdot a^{-1}) = 1</math> and by associativity <math>((a^{-1})^{-1}\cdot a^{-1})\cdot(a\cdot a^{-1}) = 1</math>.  But <math>((a^{-1})^{-1}\cdot a^{-1}) = 1</math> and <math>1\cdot(a\cdot a^{-1}) = a\cdot a^{-1}</math>, so <math>a\cdot a^{-1} = 1</math>.  Since <math>a^{-1}\cdot a = 1</math> is given by the inverse axiom, <math>a\cdot a^{-1} = a^{-1}\cdot a = 1</math>.
  
 
=== Identity commutes with all elements ===
 
=== Identity commutes with all elements ===
Thm: <math>\forall a\in G</math>    <math>a\cdot 1 = 1\cdot a = a</math>
+
Thm: Let <math>\langle G, \cdot \rangle</math> be a group.  Then <math>\forall a\in G</math>    <math>a\cdot 1 = 1\cdot a = a</math>
  
 
Prf: <math>1\cdot a = a</math> by the identity axiom, but <math>1 = a\cdot a^{-1}</math> by the previous theorem.  Substituting: <math>(a\cdot a^{-1})\cdot a = a</math> and by associativity <math>a\cdot(a^{-1}\cdot a) = a</math>.  By the inverse axiom <math>a^{-1}\cdot a = 1</math>, so substituting again <math>a\cdot 1 = a</math>.  Thus <math>a\cdot 1 = 1\cdot a = a</math>.
 
Prf: <math>1\cdot a = a</math> by the identity axiom, but <math>1 = a\cdot a^{-1}</math> by the previous theorem.  Substituting: <math>(a\cdot a^{-1})\cdot a = a</math> and by associativity <math>a\cdot(a^{-1}\cdot a) = a</math>.  By the inverse axiom <math>a^{-1}\cdot a = 1</math>, so substituting again <math>a\cdot 1 = a</math>.  Thus <math>a\cdot 1 = 1\cdot a = a</math>.
 +
 +
=== Identity is unique ===
 +
Thm: Let <math>\langle G, \cdot \rangle</math> be a group.  Then its identity element is unique.
 +
 +
Prf: Suppose <math>1_a</math> and <math>1_b</math> are both identity elements of <math>G</math>.  Then because <math>1_a</math> is an identity, by the identity axiom <math>1_a\cdot 1_b = 1_b</math>.  But because <math>1_b</math> is an identity, by the above theorem <math>1_a\cdot 1_b = 1_a</math>.  Thus <math>1_a = 1_b</math>.

Revision as of 11:35, 14 May 2008

Definition (left-sided)

A group $ \langle G, \cdot \rangle $ is a set G and a Binary Operation_OldKiwi $ \cdot $ on G (closed over G by definition) such that the group axioms hold:

  1. Associativity: $ a\cdot(b\cdot c) = (a\cdot b)\cdot c $ $ \forall a,b,c \in G $
  2. Identity: $ \exists e\in G $ such that $ e\cdot a = a $ $ \forall a \in G $
  3. Inverse: $ \forall a\in G $ $ \exists a^{-1}\in G $ such that $ a^{-1}\cdot a = e $

Notation

Groups written additively use + to denote their Binary Operation_OldKiwi, 0 to denote their identity, $ -a $ to denote the inverse of element $ a $, and $ na $ to denote $ a + a + \ldots + a $ ($ n $ terms).

Groups written multiplicatively use $ \cdot $ or juxtaposition to denote their Binary Operation_OldKiwi, 1 to denote their identity, $ a^{-1} $ to denote the inverse of element $ a $, and $ a^n $ to denote $ a \cdot a \cdot \ldots \cdot a $ ($ n $ terms).

Theorems

Element commutes with inverse

Thm: Let $ \langle G, \cdot \rangle $ be a group. Then $ \forall a\in G $ $ a\cdot a^{-1} = a^{-1}\cdot a = 1 $

Prf: Let $ a $ be an arbitrary element of $ G $. Since $ a^{-1}\in G $, it has an inverse $ (a^{-1})^{-1} $ in $ G $ such that $ (a^{-1})^{-1}\cdot a^{-1} = 1 $ by the inverse axiom. But $ 1\cdot a^{-1} = a^{-1} $ by the identity axiom, so substituting into the previous equation: $ (a^{-1})^{-1}\cdot (1\cdot a^{-1}) = 1 $. But by the inverse axiom, $ 1 = a^{-1}\cdot a $, so substituting again: $ (a^{-1})^{-1}((a^{-1}\cdot a)\cdot a^{-1}) = 1 $ and by associativity $ ((a^{-1})^{-1}\cdot a^{-1})\cdot(a\cdot a^{-1}) = 1 $. But $ ((a^{-1})^{-1}\cdot a^{-1}) = 1 $ and $ 1\cdot(a\cdot a^{-1}) = a\cdot a^{-1} $, so $ a\cdot a^{-1} = 1 $. Since $ a^{-1}\cdot a = 1 $ is given by the inverse axiom, $ a\cdot a^{-1} = a^{-1}\cdot a = 1 $.

Identity commutes with all elements

Thm: Let $ \langle G, \cdot \rangle $ be a group. Then $ \forall a\in G $ $ a\cdot 1 = 1\cdot a = a $

Prf: $ 1\cdot a = a $ by the identity axiom, but $ 1 = a\cdot a^{-1} $ by the previous theorem. Substituting: $ (a\cdot a^{-1})\cdot a = a $ and by associativity $ a\cdot(a^{-1}\cdot a) = a $. By the inverse axiom $ a^{-1}\cdot a = 1 $, so substituting again $ a\cdot 1 = a $. Thus $ a\cdot 1 = 1\cdot a = a $.

Identity is unique

Thm: Let $ \langle G, \cdot \rangle $ be a group. Then its identity element is unique.

Prf: Suppose $ 1_a $ and $ 1_b $ are both identity elements of $ G $. Then because $ 1_a $ is an identity, by the identity axiom $ 1_a\cdot 1_b = 1_b $. But because $ 1_b $ is an identity, by the above theorem $ 1_a\cdot 1_b = 1_a $. Thus $ 1_a = 1_b $.

Alumni Liaison

Followed her dream after having raised her family.

Ruth Enoch, PhD Mathematics