Line 21: Line 21:
  
 
- You guys are life-savers.  I was doing them right, but on 50 and 56 I made stupid simple math errors like saying a half times two was a fourth...Thanks guys.
 
- You guys are life-savers.  I was doing them right, but on 50 and 56 I made stupid simple math errors like saying a half times two was a fourth...Thanks guys.
--[[User:Klosekam|Klosekam]] 15:23, 8 October 2008 (UTC)Shouldn't the answer to number 56 be \frac{\pi}{2} - \ln{2} <\math> because you have to bring the 2 out before you take the integral meaning you have to multiply the first part of the answer from above by 2.
+
 
 +
--[[User:Klosekam|Klosekam]] 15:26, 8 October 2008 (UTC)Shouldn't the answer to number 56 be <math> \frac{\pi}{2} - \ln{2} <\math> because you have to bring out a 2 before you take the integral meaning that you have to multiply the first part of the answer from above by 2.

Revision as of 10:26, 8 October 2008

I'm going to give my even answers so far just to compare and see if everyone else is getting the same. Some are a little weird in my opinion. I used a calculator on a few too. -By the way, go here and make sure your preferences are set right so it makes these easier to read.

$ 38: \pi $

$ 48: x - \arctan{x} + c $

$ 50: ln(9) - 4 $

$ 56: \frac{\pi}{4} - \ln{2} $

$ 84 a) : -\cos(\theta)+\frac{1}{3}\cos^3(\theta)+c $

$ 84b) : -\cos(\theta)+\frac{2}{3}\cos^3(\theta)-\frac{1}{5}\cos^5(\theta)+c $

---Gary Brizendine II 14:51, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

I have corrected the answer to numbers 50 and 56.

--John Mason 15:41, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

- You guys are life-savers. I was doing them right, but on 50 and 56 I made stupid simple math errors like saying a half times two was a fourth...Thanks guys.

--Klosekam 15:26, 8 October 2008 (UTC)Shouldn't the answer to number 56 be $ \frac{\pi}{2} - \ln{2} <\math> because you have to bring out a 2 before you take the integral meaning that you have to multiply the first part of the answer from above by 2. $

Alumni Liaison

To all math majors: "Mathematics is a wonderfully rich subject."

Dr. Paul Garrett