Line 11: Line 11:
 
thus  <math> a^{n}=1</math> by the def of order
 
thus  <math> a^{n}=1</math> by the def of order
  
then <math>\phi_{a}^{n}(x)=a^{n}xa^{-1}=1x1=x</math> making x the identity
+
then <math>\phi_{a}^{n}(x)=a^{n}xa^{-n}=1x1=x</math> making x the identity
  
 
since <math>\phi_{a}^{n}(x)=</math>identity then <math>|\phi_{a}(x)|=min(n, c) </math> were c is a division of n since any multiple of c, including n, will also give the identity
 
since <math>\phi_{a}^{n}(x)=</math>identity then <math>|\phi_{a}(x)|=min(n, c) </math> were c is a division of n since any multiple of c, including n, will also give the identity

Latest revision as of 01:35, 25 September 2008

Any body have any ideas???? I'm lost.


I don't know either. I looked in the back of the book, but I don't see how what they're saying has anything to do with the problem. The back of the book is talking about how $ \phi_{a^{n}}=1 $, but I thought that we basically needed to show that $ \phi_{a}^{n}=1 $. All I can show is that $ \phi_{a}^{n}(x)=ax^{n}a^{-1} $, and that $ \phi_{a}^{n}(x)=x $ if G is abelian.

---

What the book is saying:

let $ |a|=n $

thus $ a^{n}=1 $ by the def of order

then $ \phi_{a}^{n}(x)=a^{n}xa^{-n}=1x1=x $ making x the identity

since $ \phi_{a}^{n}(x)= $identity then $ |\phi_{a}(x)|=min(n, c) $ were c is a division of n since any multiple of c, including n, will also give the identity

hope this helps

-zach


Yeah, I just figured that out and was posting about it when you put that up. Thanks.

Alumni Liaison

Abstract algebra continues the conceptual developments of linear algebra, on an even grander scale.

Dr. Paul Garrett