| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Any body have any ideas???? I'm lost. | Any body have any ideas???? I'm lost. | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | I don't know either. I looked in the back of the book, but I don't see how what they're saying has anything to do with the problem. The back of the book is talking about <math>\phi_{a^{n}}</math>, but I thought that we needed to | + | I don't know either. I looked in the back of the book, but I don't see how what they're saying has anything to do with the problem. The back of the book is talking about <math>\phi_{a^{n}}</math>, but I thought that we basically needed to show that <math>\phi_{a}^{n}=1</math>. |
Revision as of 18:24, 24 September 2008
Any body have any ideas???? I'm lost.
I don't know either. I looked in the back of the book, but I don't see how what they're saying has anything to do with the problem. The back of the book is talking about $ \phi_{a^{n}} $, but I thought that we basically needed to show that $ \phi_{a}^{n}=1 $.
