m |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I like your examples and your consideration of all cases of input signals x(t) (including non-bounded ones). Your definitions get the point across, though saying <math>|x(t)| < \epsilon </math> isn't technically correct, assuming you mean <math>\epsilon</math> to be a real constant. (One should say <math>\forall t \in \mathbb{R}, |x(t)| < \epsilon </math>.) -Brian Thomas | I like your examples and your consideration of all cases of input signals x(t) (including non-bounded ones). Your definitions get the point across, though saying <math>|x(t)| < \epsilon </math> isn't technically correct, assuming you mean <math>\epsilon</math> to be a real constant. (One should say <math>\forall t \in \mathbb{R}, |x(t)| < \epsilon </math>.) -Brian Thomas | ||
| + | |||
| + | Very clear answer, I had no problem understanding the wording. As far as I know it was correct. | ||
| + | -Collin Phillips | ||
Revision as of 06:50, 18 September 2008
Your answer is pretty good. I liked how it was to-the-point yet informative. It is pretty awesome, just shy of how awesome mine is. -Virgil Hsieh
I like your examples and your consideration of all cases of input signals x(t) (including non-bounded ones). Your definitions get the point across, though saying $ |x(t)| < \epsilon $ isn't technically correct, assuming you mean $ \epsilon $ to be a real constant. (One should say $ \forall t \in \mathbb{R}, |x(t)| < \epsilon $.) -Brian Thomas
Very clear answer, I had no problem understanding the wording. As far as I know it was correct. -Collin Phillips
