(New page: Your answer is pretty good. I liked how it was to-the-point yet informative. It is pretty awesome, just shy of how awesome mine is. -Virgil Hsieh)
 
(Brian Thomas Rhea HW3.a "Grading")
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Your answer is pretty good. I liked how it was to-the-point yet informative. It is pretty awesome, just shy of how awesome mine is. -Virgil Hsieh
 
Your answer is pretty good. I liked how it was to-the-point yet informative. It is pretty awesome, just shy of how awesome mine is. -Virgil Hsieh
 +
 +
I like your examples and your consideration of all cases of input signals x(t) (including non-bounded ones).  Your definitions get the point across, though saying <math>|x(t)| < \epsilon </math> isn't technically correct, assuming you mean <math>\epsilon</math> to be a real constant.  (One should say <math>\forall t \in \mathbb{R}, |x(t)| < \epsilon </math>).  -Brian Thomas

Revision as of 05:18, 18 September 2008

Your answer is pretty good. I liked how it was to-the-point yet informative. It is pretty awesome, just shy of how awesome mine is. -Virgil Hsieh

I like your examples and your consideration of all cases of input signals x(t) (including non-bounded ones). Your definitions get the point across, though saying $ |x(t)| < \epsilon $ isn't technically correct, assuming you mean $ \epsilon $ to be a real constant. (One should say $ \forall t \in \mathbb{R}, |x(t)| < \epsilon $). -Brian Thomas

Alumni Liaison

Questions/answers with a recent ECE grad

Ryne Rayburn