(HW3.A "grading" Brian Thomas) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Short and to the point. I like the formality of your definitions. The example also helps make sure the reader understands what you're talking about. -Phil Cannon | Short and to the point. I like the formality of your definitions. The example also helps make sure the reader understands what you're talking about. -Phil Cannon | ||
| + | |||
| + | I like how your definition is short and to the point. However, you may want to note that a non-causal signal ''may'' depend on past and present input signals, in addition to future input signals. --Brian Thomas | ||
Revision as of 05:10, 18 September 2008
Your definitions seem clear and accurate, but an example of a causal system might help. --Ben Laskowski
Short and to the point. I like the formality of your definitions. The example also helps make sure the reader understands what you're talking about. -Phil Cannon
I like how your definition is short and to the point. However, you may want to note that a non-causal signal may depend on past and present input signals, in addition to future input signals. --Brian Thomas
