(Comments)
(Comments)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Comments ==
 
== Comments ==
Instead of this method, we should expand it in terms of <math>\cos(2t) =\frac{e^{2jt}+e^{-2jt}}{2}\,</math>, as we what will happen to a random signal other than the signal shown. It might produce a different random response. By expanding it we can be sure it's right.
+
Instead of this method, we should expand it in terms of <math>\cos(2t) =\frac{e^{2jt}+e^{-2jt}}{2}\,</math>, as we what will happen to a random signal other than the signal shown. It might produce a different random response. By expanding it we can be sure it's right. - Wei Jian Chan
 
+
Comment by : 00185-37978
+

Revision as of 17:31, 15 September 2008

Comments

Instead of this method, we should expand it in terms of $ \cos(2t) =\frac{e^{2jt}+e^{-2jt}}{2}\, $, as we what will happen to a random signal other than the signal shown. It might produce a different random response. By expanding it we can be sure it's right. - Wei Jian Chan

Alumni Liaison

Correspondence Chess Grandmaster and Purdue Alumni

Prof. Dan Fleetwood