(Review by MRH added) |
(added review by Chloe Kauffman) |
||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | *Review by | + | *Review by Chloe Kauffman |
| − | + | ||
| + | This was a very helpful slecture for Nyquist. I would have liked to seen the tie between sampling at exactly above Nyquist, versus even larger of a sampling frequency for real world design application. I.e. sampling at just above Nyquist requires a nearly perfect LPF with sharp cutoff, vs. limitation of even larger Nyquist rates. Your graphs and explanations aided in the topic learning. | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Revision as of 01:28, 15 October 2014
Questions and Comments for
Nyquist TheoremPlease post your reviews, comments, and questions below.
- Review by Yerkebulan Y.
Very clear explanation of Nyquist Theorem in words, which is also supported with graphs. Also,I need to mention exception that you provided. I am not sure if signal can have such FT.
- Review by Fabian Faes
I enjoyed the mathematical steps that were taken to show how the Nyquist Theorem upholds when performing reconstruction, however I do believe that more graphs would have been beneficial in the understanding. The fact that there is a strong conclusion which states how reconstruction is sometimes possible even though the Nyquist condition is not met is an important message to be closed on. Overall it is a good slecture!
- Review by Michael Hayashi
I enjoyed the presentation of the Nyquist Theorem in this slecture. Your proof was solid and the coloration of the center copy removed the need to have more graphs. It was a fun exercise to include the Nyquist-violating sampling example in your presentation; nothing could have done a better job explaining the sufficient, but not necessary, aspect of using the Nyquist condition for reconstruction. I applaud the thoroughness and accuracy of this slecture.
- Review by Chloe Kauffman
This was a very helpful slecture for Nyquist. I would have liked to seen the tie between sampling at exactly above Nyquist, versus even larger of a sampling frequency for real world design application. I.e. sampling at just above Nyquist requires a nearly perfect LPF with sharp cutoff, vs. limitation of even larger Nyquist rates. Your graphs and explanations aided in the topic learning.
- Review by student 5
- Author answer here
- Review by student 6
- Author answer here
- Review by student 7
- Author answer here
- Review by student 8
- Author answer here
- Review by student 9
- Author answer here
- Review by student 10
- Author answer here
