| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
**Author answer here | **Author answer here | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | * Review by | + | * Review by Soonho Kwon |
| + | |||
| + | It would have been better with the introduction, definition and conclusion. Having two graphs, had the effect of a little bit too much of simplicity, but it also was very clear to understand. Overall great job! | ||
| + | |||
**Author answer here | **Author answer here | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Revision as of 17:49, 14 October 2014
Questions and Comments for
Please post your reviews, comments, and questions below.
- Review by Miguel Castellanos
You illustrate the basic concept of the proof well and you are concise. I think it would be a bit clearer if you mentioned what type of sampling you used and gave an example to illustrate the concept. A little more detail for the proof might be helpful to those not so comfortable with the material. Your ending remark is a good summary of the results of this theorem.
- Author answer here
- Review by Yijun Han
Your proof of Nyquist theorem is correct and clear, but you need to provide an example to show what happens when Nyquist condition satisfies or not satisfies.
- Author answer here
- Review by Soonho Kwon
It would have been better with the introduction, definition and conclusion. Having two graphs, had the effect of a little bit too much of simplicity, but it also was very clear to understand. Overall great job!
- Author answer here
- Review by student 4
- Author answer here
