| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| − | <center><font size="4"> | + | <center><font size="4"></font> |
| − | Questions and Comments for | + | <font size="4">Questions and Comments for </font> <font size="4">[[Slecture rep comb ECE438 Xiaozhe|Definition of Rep and Comb]] </font> |
| − | </font> | + | |
| − | <font size="4">[[Slecture rep comb ECE438 Xiaozhe|Definition of Rep and Comb]] </font> | + | |
A [https://www.projectrhea.org/learning/slectures.php slecture] by [[ECE]] student Xiaozhe Fan | A [https://www.projectrhea.org/learning/slectures.php slecture] by [[ECE]] student Xiaozhe Fan | ||
| Line 34: | Line 32: | ||
*Review by Yerkebulan Y. | *Review by Yerkebulan Y. | ||
| − | * You provided good and clear explanation of rep and comb both graphically and by equations. You should have also explained impulse train p<sub>T</sub>(t) graphically. And at the end you just mentioned that comb is a CTFT of a rep. I think it would be better if you also included that rep is CTFT of a comb.<br> | + | * You provided good and clear explanation of rep and comb both graphically and by equations. You should have also explained impulse train p<sub>T</sub>(t) graphically. And at the end you just mentioned that comb is a CTFT of a rep. I think it would be better if you also included that rep is CTFT of a comb.<br> |
**Author answers here | **Author answers here | ||
Revision as of 09:07, 14 October 2014
Questions and Comments for Definition of Rep and Comb
Please post your reviews, comments, and questions below.
- Miguel Castellanos
I like how you introduce both operators with a graphical representation and then proceed to give a mathematical description. This organization seems natural to me. I also like how you explain the use of each operator. In your introduction to the rep operator, I believe it should be $ k \in \mathbb{Z} $ since you want to allow k to be negative as well. Also, you could clean up your multiplications by removing the periods (multiplication is implied by convention). Great slecture!
- Author answer here
- Review by Jacob Holtman
The initial outline and the numbering system makes the process easy to see. In the comb example the graph is easy to understand. The function PT does not get explained until 1.1.4 while it is used in 1.1.3. It would be good to explain what that function means
- Author answer here
- Review by Yerkebulan Y.
- You provided good and clear explanation of rep and comb both graphically and by equations. You should have also explained impulse train pT(t) graphically. And at the end you just mentioned that comb is a CTFT of a rep. I think it would be better if you also included that rep is CTFT of a comb.
- Author answers here
- Review by student 4
- Author answer here
