| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
**Author answer here | **Author answer here | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | * Review by | + | * Review by Andrew Pawling |
| − | **Author answer here | + | I agree that it does need a mathematical definition of down sampling. The plots are good and help illustrate the down-sampling. The Mathematical explanation is very clear and concise. The explanation of why the low-pass filter is needed is also good. Great job! |
| + | **Author answer here | ||
---- | ---- | ||
* Review by student 3 | * Review by student 3 | ||
Revision as of 17:21, 14 October 2014
Questions and Comments for
Please post your reviews, comments, and questions below.
- Review by Jacob Holtman
There should be a mathematical definition of down sampling and not just a graphical one. Also the points that are kept in the second graph should be explained better and not left to the reader to find. The equations are very well set up and it is easy to follow the logic. Also the example helps to explain why a filter is needed and limitations.
- Author answer here
- Review by Andrew Pawling
I agree that it does need a mathematical definition of down sampling. The plots are good and help illustrate the down-sampling. The Mathematical explanation is very clear and concise. The explanation of why the low-pass filter is needed is also good. Great job!
- Author answer here
- Review by student 3
- Author answer here
- Review by student 4
- Author answer here
