Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
now we let <math>\omega</math> = 2<math>\pi</math><math>f</math> | now we let <math>\omega</math> = 2<math>\pi</math><math>f</math> | ||
− | <math>X(2\pi f)=\int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty} x(t)e^{-j2\pi ft} dt </math> | + | <math>X(2\pi f)=\int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty} x(t)e^{-j2\pi ft} dt </math> making X(<math>2\pi f</math> = X(<math>f</math> |
+ | |||
+ | |||
---- | ---- | ||
---- | ---- |
Revision as of 11:40, 18 September 2014
Fourier Transform as a Function of Frequency w Versus Frequency f (in Hertz)
A slecture by ECE student Randall Cochran
Partly based on the ECE438 Fall 2014 lecture material of Prof. Mireille Boutin.
To show the relationship between the Fourier Transform of frequency $ \omega $ versus frequency $ f $ (in hertz) we start with the definitions: $ X(w)=\int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty} x(t)e^{-jwt} dt \qquad \qquad \qquad \qquad X(f)=\int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty}x(t)e^{-j2\pi ft} dt $
now we let $ \omega $ = 2$ \pi $$ f $
$ X(2\pi f)=\int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty} x(t)e^{-j2\pi ft} dt $ making X($ 2\pi f $ = X($ f $
(create a question page and put a link below)
Questions and comments
If you have any questions, comments, etc. please post them on this page.