Line 5: Line 5:
 
<br>  
 
<br>  
  
Question from James Down Under ([[User:Jayling|Jayling]]):
+
Question from James Down Under ([[User:Jayling|Jayling]]):  
  
For Page 329 Question 11. Am I meant to calculate all eigenvalues and eigenvectors or just calculate the eigenvector corresponding to the given eigenvalue of 3?
+
For Page 329 Question 11. Am I meant to calculate all eigenvalues and eigenvectors or just calculate the eigenvector corresponding to the given eigenvalue of 3?  
  
Answer from [[User:Bell|Steve Bell]] :
+
Answer from [[User:Bell|Steve Bell]]&nbsp;:  
  
Yes, you are only supposed to find the eigenvector for lambda=3.
+
Yes, you are only supposed to find the eigenvector for lambda=3. (The idea here is to spare you from finding the roots of a rather nasty 3rd degree polynomial.)  
(The idea here is to spare you from finding the roots of a rather
+
nasty 3rd degree polynomial.)
+
  
[[User:Jayling|Jayling]]: thanks Steve, I did try the hard way first but then started to drown in the algebra.
+
[[User:Jayling|Jayling]]: thanks Steve, I did try the hard way first but then started to drown in the algebra.  
  
Question from a student:
+
Question from a student:  
  
Let 3x+4y+2z = 0; 2x+5z= 0 be the system for which I have to find the basis.
+
Let 3x+4y+2z = 0; 2x+5z= 0 be the system for which I have to find the basis.  
  
When Row Reduced the above system gives [ 1 0 2.5 0 ; 0 1 -1.375 0].
+
When Row Reduced the above system gives [ 1 0 2.5 0&nbsp;; 0 1 -1.375 0].  
  
Rank = no of non zero rows = 2 => Dim(rowspace) = 2 ; Nullity = # free variables = 1
+
Rank = no of non zero rows = 2 =&gt; Dim(rowspace) = 2&nbsp;; Nullity = # free variables = 1  
  
Q1: Aren't [ 1 0 2.5] and [0 1 -1.375] called the basis of the system?
+
Q1: Aren't [ 1 0 2.5] and [0 1 -1.375] called the basis of the system?  
  
A1 from [[User:Bell|Steve Bell]]:
+
A1 from [[User:Bell|Steve Bell]]:  
  
Those two vectors form a basis for the ROW SPACE.
+
Those two vectors form a basis for the ROW SPACE.  
  
The solution space is only 1 dimensional (since the
+
The solution space is only 1 dimensional (since the number of free variables is only 1).  
number of free variables is only 1).
+
  
Q2: Why is that we get a basis by considering the free variable as some "parameter" and reducing further(and get 1 vector in this case). Isn't
+
Q2: Why is that we get a basis by considering the free variable as some "parameter" and reducing further(and get 1 vector in this case). Isn't that the solution of the system?  
that the solution of the system?
+
  
A2 from [[User:Bell|Steve Bell]] :
+
A2 from [[User:Bell|Steve Bell]]&nbsp;:  
  
If the system row reduces to
+
If the system row reduces to  
 
+
<pre>[ 1 0  2.5  0 ]
<PRE>
+
[ 1 0  2.5  0 ]
+
 
[ 0 1 -1.375 0 ]
 
[ 0 1 -1.375 0 ]
</PRE>
+
</pre>  
 +
then z is the free variable. Let it be t. The top equation gives
  
then z is the free variable. Let it be t.
+
x = -2.5 t  
The top equation gives
+
  
x = -2.5 t
+
and the second equation gives
  
and the second equation gives
+
y = 1.375 t
  
y = 1.375 t
+
and of course,
  
and of course,
+
z = t.
  
z = t.
+
So the general solution is  
 
+
<pre>[ x ]  [ -2.5  ]
So the general solution is
+
 
+
<PRE>
+
[ x ]  [ -2.5  ]
+
 
[ y ] = [  1.375 ] t
 
[ y ] = [  1.375 ] t
 
[ z ]  [  1    ]
 
[ z ]  [  1    ]
</PRE>
+
</pre>  
 +
Thus, you can find the solution from the row echelon matrix, but I wouldn't say that you can read it off from there -- not without practice, at least.
  
Thus, you can find the solution from the row echelon matrix, but I wouldn't say that you can read it off from there -- not without practice, at least.
+
Question from the Linear Algebra Noobee ([[User:Jayling|Jayling]]) regarding the Lesson 7 material
  
Question from the Linear Algebra Noobee ([[User:Jayling|Jayling]]) regarding the Lesson 7 material
+
An observation from me with eigenvalues and eigenvectors on the 2x2 matrices examples that you presented is that the column space of A-λI when you solve for the first eigenvalue corresponds to the column vector of the second eigenvalue? For the example on page 2 when you REF the A-λI the pivot yields the column space vector in the original matrix of [-2 1]T which exactly matches the eigenvector for when λ=-4, and similarly vice versa when λ=-1 and you REF the A-λI matrix it yields a column space vector of [1 1] T. Is this true for all matrix eigenvalue problems in general, I noticed that it is also true for the complex example that follows? Is this an obvious fact or just a coincidence? Your insight on this would be appreciated.  
 
+
An observation from me with eigenvalues and eigenvectors on the 2x2 matrices examples that you presented is that the column space of A-λI when you solve for the first eigenvalue corresponds to the column vector of the second eigenvalue? For the example on page 2 when you REF the A-λI the pivot yields the column space vector in the original matrix of [-2 1]T which exactly matches the eigenvector for when λ=-4, and similarly vice versa when λ=-1 and you REF the A-λI matrix it yields a column space vector of [1 1] T. Is this true for all matrix eigenvalue problems in general, I noticed that it is also true for the complex example that follows? Is this an obvious fact or just a coincidence? Your insight on this would be appreciated.
+
  
 
----
 
----
  
[[2013 Fall MA 527 Bell|Back to MA527, Fall 2013]]
+
<br>
 
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
  
 +
On problem 11, I swapped rows 1 and 2 during row reduction and my final solution has x1 and x2 swapped. Do I need to swap back any row swaps or did I make a mistake along the way? [[User:Tlouvar|Tlouvar]]
  
 +
<br>
  
 +
[[2013 Fall MA 527 Bell|Back to MA527, Fall 2013]]
  
 +
<br>
  
 +
<br>
  
 +
<br>
  
 +
<br>
  
 +
<br>
  
 +
<br>
  
 +
<br>
  
 +
<br>
  
 
[[2013 Fall MA 527 Bell|Back to MA527, Fall 2013]]
 
[[2013 Fall MA 527 Bell|Back to MA527, Fall 2013]]

Revision as of 16:18, 5 September 2013


Homework 3 collaboration area


Question from James Down Under (Jayling):

For Page 329 Question 11. Am I meant to calculate all eigenvalues and eigenvectors or just calculate the eigenvector corresponding to the given eigenvalue of 3?

Answer from Steve Bell :

Yes, you are only supposed to find the eigenvector for lambda=3. (The idea here is to spare you from finding the roots of a rather nasty 3rd degree polynomial.)

Jayling: thanks Steve, I did try the hard way first but then started to drown in the algebra.

Question from a student:

Let 3x+4y+2z = 0; 2x+5z= 0 be the system for which I have to find the basis.

When Row Reduced the above system gives [ 1 0 2.5 0 ; 0 1 -1.375 0].

Rank = no of non zero rows = 2 => Dim(rowspace) = 2 ; Nullity = # free variables = 1

Q1: Aren't [ 1 0 2.5] and [0 1 -1.375] called the basis of the system?

A1 from Steve Bell:

Those two vectors form a basis for the ROW SPACE.

The solution space is only 1 dimensional (since the number of free variables is only 1).

Q2: Why is that we get a basis by considering the free variable as some "parameter" and reducing further(and get 1 vector in this case). Isn't that the solution of the system?

A2 from Steve Bell :

If the system row reduces to

[ 1 0  2.5   0 ]
[ 0 1 -1.375 0 ]

then z is the free variable. Let it be t. The top equation gives

x = -2.5 t

and the second equation gives

y = 1.375 t

and of course,

z = t.

So the general solution is

[ x ]   [ -2.5   ]
[ y ] = [  1.375 ] t
[ z ]   [  1     ]

Thus, you can find the solution from the row echelon matrix, but I wouldn't say that you can read it off from there -- not without practice, at least.

Question from the Linear Algebra Noobee (Jayling) regarding the Lesson 7 material

An observation from me with eigenvalues and eigenvectors on the 2x2 matrices examples that you presented is that the column space of A-λI when you solve for the first eigenvalue corresponds to the column vector of the second eigenvalue? For the example on page 2 when you REF the A-λI the pivot yields the column space vector in the original matrix of [-2 1]T which exactly matches the eigenvector for when λ=-4, and similarly vice versa when λ=-1 and you REF the A-λI matrix it yields a column space vector of [1 1] T. Is this true for all matrix eigenvalue problems in general, I noticed that it is also true for the complex example that follows? Is this an obvious fact or just a coincidence? Your insight on this would be appreciated.



On problem 11, I swapped rows 1 and 2 during row reduction and my final solution has x1 and x2 swapped. Do I need to swap back any row swaps or did I make a mistake along the way? Tlouvar


Back to MA527, Fall 2013









Back to MA527, Fall 2013

Alumni Liaison

To all math majors: "Mathematics is a wonderfully rich subject."

Dr. Paul Garrett