Line 20: Line 20:
  
 
What I did was write out the sequence (Xn) to notice that (Xn+1) (the next element in the sequence) is equal to 1 + 1/Xn (this was not intuitive to me). Knowing that both (Xn) and (Xn+1) equal the same limit you can set them equal to each other like in example 3.4.3, then solve.
 
What I did was write out the sequence (Xn) to notice that (Xn+1) (the next element in the sequence) is equal to 1 + 1/Xn (this was not intuitive to me). Knowing that both (Xn) and (Xn+1) equal the same limit you can set them equal to each other like in example 3.4.3, then solve.
 +
 +
--
 +
Siddharth Tekriwal:
 +
 +
you can use the fibonacci equation. f(n+2) = f(n+1) + f(n)
 +
Therefore (fn+2)/(fn+1) = 1 + (fn)/(fn+1). You can then try to prove that both terms are not unbounded and then apply the quotient theorem.
 +
 +
  
  
More detail about this solution method can also be found at http://www.mathacademy.com/pr/prime/articles/fibonac/index.asp
 
M.N.
 
 
----
 
----

Revision as of 16:35, 10 March 2010

To ask a new question, add a line and type in your question. You can use LaTeX to type math. Here is a link to a short LaTeX tutorial.

To answer a question, open the page for editing and start typing below the question...

go back to the Discussion Page


In #5, I'm having trouble figuring out how to prove that sequence $ Z $ is bounded in order to use Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem and Theorem 3.4.9 to prove the necessary and sufficient conditions. I know that since both sequences $ X $ and $ Y $ are convergent that they are bounded, but I can't quite figure out how to use this information to prove that $ Z $ is bounded.

-- Siddharth Tekriwal:

You can try to approach the problem in a different way. Lets say x and y converge to L. Show that for some n>a, abs(x-L)<e and n>b, abs(y-L)<e. Then show that there exists some c for which, n>c, abs(z-L)<e!


In #3, what will be a good starting point? I am having difficulty proceeding through the problem.

--Rrichmo 20:15, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

What I did was write out the sequence (Xn) to notice that (Xn+1) (the next element in the sequence) is equal to 1 + 1/Xn (this was not intuitive to me). Knowing that both (Xn) and (Xn+1) equal the same limit you can set them equal to each other like in example 3.4.3, then solve.

-- Siddharth Tekriwal:

you can use the fibonacci equation. f(n+2) = f(n+1) + f(n) Therefore (fn+2)/(fn+1) = 1 + (fn)/(fn+1). You can then try to prove that both terms are not unbounded and then apply the quotient theorem.




Alumni Liaison

Followed her dream after having raised her family.

Ruth Enoch, PhD Mathematics