Line 32: Line 32:
  
  
 +
'''Reply from a Student:''' So Here's my rough draft of it. I think this is enough but I could be missing something. Could not figure out how to get this looking good for the wiki so I used an image upload site. here's the link. http://imgur.com/Ae0sJ.jpg
  
  
So Here's my rough draft of it. I think this is enough but I could be missing something. Could not figure out how to get this looking good for the wiki so I used an image upload site. here's the link. http://imgur.com/Ae0sJ.jpg
+
'''Prof. Alekseenko:''' Thanks very much! The solution seems ok. A few minor detail can be corrected, but overall I do not see any problems with the proof. The last step, however, needs to be justified using the appropriate theorem in this section.

Latest revision as of 08:39, 10 February 2010

To ask a new question, add a line and type in your question. You can use LaTeX to type math. Here is a link to a short LaTeX tutorial.


To answer a question, open the page for editing and start typing below the question...

go back to the Discussion Page


I am having trouble with exercise 2.4.10. I don't understand how I can prove what is being asked without using a specific range or function. Can anyone help with this?

Prof. Alekseenko: Perhaps one could start from looking at functions $ f(x)\, $ and $ g(y)\, $ closely.

Here is a hint: consider any point $ (x_0,y_0) \, $.

(1) What can be said about $ f(x_{0})\, $ and $ h(x_0,y_0) \, $?


(2) Similarly, what can be said about $ g(y_{0})\, $ and $ h(x_0,y_0)\, $?


(3) Finally, what can be said about $ f(x_0)\, $

and $  g(y_0)\,  $ for any $ x_0\in X  $ and $ y_0 \in Y $?


(4) How can this help to establish the desired inequality?


Can anybody fill in the detail?


Reply from a Student: So Here's my rough draft of it. I think this is enough but I could be missing something. Could not figure out how to get this looking good for the wiki so I used an image upload site. here's the link. Ae0sJ.jpg


Prof. Alekseenko: Thanks very much! The solution seems ok. A few minor detail can be corrected, but overall I do not see any problems with the proof. The last step, however, needs to be justified using the appropriate theorem in this section.

Alumni Liaison

Prof. Math. Ohio State and Associate Dean
Outstanding Alumnus Purdue Math 2008

Jeff McNeal