Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
Maybe a stupid question but should we prove if a=b then (a+c)=(b+c) if we want to use this property? Can't find where it is given in the book.
 
Maybe a stupid question but should we prove if a=b then (a+c)=(b+c) if we want to use this property? Can't find where it is given in the book.
 +
 +
Dr. Alekseenko: Apparently, this equation a consequence of
 +
 +
<math> (a+c)-(b+c) = </math>
 +
 +
use associative law
 +
 +
<math> a + (c - b) + c =</math>
 +
 +
use commutative law
 +
 +
<math> a + (b + (-c)) + c =</math>
 +
 +
next associative law, again,
 +
 +
<math> a + b + ((-c) + c) =</math>
 +
 +
finally use axiom of zero, i.e.,  <math> (-c)+c =0 </math> we obtain
 +
 +
<math> a + b + 0 </math>
 +
 +
then, again by the zero axiom
 +
 +
<math> a + b </math>
 +
 +
Since we have just established it, you do not need to prove it in your homework.
 +
(but you have to put a reference to this proof).
 +
 +
----

Revision as of 04:11, 26 January 2010

To ask a new question, add a line and type in your question. You can use LaTeX to type math. Here is a link to a short LaTeX tutorial.


To answer a question, open the page for editing and start typing below the question...

go back to the Discussion Page


Maybe a stupid question but should we prove if a=b then (a+c)=(b+c) if we want to use this property? Can't find where it is given in the book.

Dr. Alekseenko: Apparently, this equation a consequence of

$ (a+c)-(b+c) = $

use associative law

$ a + (c - b) + c = $

use commutative law

$ a + (b + (-c)) + c = $

next associative law, again,

$ a + b + ((-c) + c) = $

finally use axiom of zero, i.e., $ (-c)+c =0 $ we obtain

$ a + b + 0 $

then, again by the zero axiom

$ a + b $

Since we have just established it, you do not need to prove it in your homework.

(but you have to put a reference to this proof).

Alumni Liaison

Abstract algebra continues the conceptual developments of linear algebra, on an even grander scale.

Dr. Paul Garrett