Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Use mathematical induction to show that given a set of n + 1 positive integers, none exceeding 2n, there is at least one integer in this set that divides another integer in the set.
 
Use mathematical induction to show that given a set of n + 1 positive integers, none exceeding 2n, there is at least one integer in this set that divides another integer in the set.
 +
 +
 +
----
  
 
Here is an idea: P(n)="given a set of n + 1 positive integers, none exceeding 2n, there is at least one integer in this set that divides another integer in the set".
 
Here is an idea: P(n)="given a set of n + 1 positive integers, none exceeding 2n, there is at least one integer in this set that divides another integer in the set".
  
Then assume P(n) and prove P(n+1) by  
+
Then assume P(n) and prove P(n+1) by
 
a) checking what happens when at most one of 2n+1 and 2n+2 are chosen,
 
a) checking what happens when at most one of 2n+1 and 2n+2 are chosen,
 
b) what happens if both are chosen.
 
b) what happens if both are chosen.
Line 12: Line 15:
  
 
if n+1 was not chosen, pretend you also get to chose k+1 and go from there.
 
if n+1 was not chosen, pretend you also get to chose k+1 and go from there.
 +
 +
----
 +
 +
If one or none is chosen is easier than if both are chosen. The problem is if 2n+1, 2n+2 and n+1 is not chosen. It's a great start, but it took me a while to figure out where to go from there.
 +
 +
Here's the way I ordered the numbers in my proof, noticing where n+1 and n+2 go.
 +
<pre>
 +
1  3  5  7  9 11 13 15
 +
2  6 10 14
 +
4 12
 +
8
 +
16
 +
</pre>

Revision as of 11:00, 2 September 2008

Does anyone know how to go about starting problem 50 for 4.1

Use mathematical induction to show that given a set of n + 1 positive integers, none exceeding 2n, there is at least one integer in this set that divides another integer in the set.



Here is an idea: P(n)="given a set of n + 1 positive integers, none exceeding 2n, there is at least one integer in this set that divides another integer in the set".

Then assume P(n) and prove P(n+1) by a) checking what happens when at most one of 2n+1 and 2n+2 are chosen, b) what happens if both are chosen.

b) is harder, investigate what happens if n+1 was chosen.

if n+1 was not chosen, pretend you also get to chose k+1 and go from there.


If one or none is chosen is easier than if both are chosen. The problem is if 2n+1, 2n+2 and n+1 is not chosen. It's a great start, but it took me a while to figure out where to go from there.

Here's the way I ordered the numbers in my proof, noticing where n+1 and n+2 go.

 1  3  5  7  9 11 13 15
 2  6 10 14
 4 12
 8
16

Alumni Liaison

has a message for current ECE438 students.

Sean Hu, ECE PhD 2009