Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
== ECE 608 professor Ghafoor Spring 2009  ==
 
== ECE 608 professor Ghafoor Spring 2009  ==
 +
 +
== What's New==
 +
*[[Plus_or_minus_discussion|Are you for or against using plus or minus grades?]] <B> - <SPAN STYLE="text-decoration: blink;color:red"> New, Purdue-Wide discussion! </span> </B>
 +
  
 
==TA==
 
==TA==

Revision as of 08:14, 26 February 2009


Rhea Section for ECE 608 Professor Ghafoor, Spring 2009

If you create a page that belongs to this course, please write

[[Category:ECE608Spring2009ghafoor]]

at the top of the page. You may also add any other category you feel is appropriate (e.g., "homework", "Fourier", etc.).

ECE 608 professor Ghafoor Spring 2009

What's New


TA

Hamza Bin Sohail Office Hours: Tuesday & Thursday 4:30-5:30PM in EE306

Course Website

http://cobweb.ecn.purdue.edu/~ee608/

Newsgroup

On the news.purdue.edu server: purdue.class.ece608

One way to access: SSH to a server at Purdue (ie expert.ics.purdue.edu) and type "lynx news.purdue.edu/purdue.class.ece608"

On Ubuntu, you can use the "Pan" newsreader.

  • "sudo apt-get install pan"
  • Set "news.purdue.edu" as the server. You do not need to enter login information.
  • Type "purdue.class.ece608" in the box in the upper-left of the screen.
  • After a delay (half a minute?) the newsgroup will appear in the left pane. You can right click the group to "subscribe".

Reviewed Algorithms

Discussions

Area to post questions, set up study groups, etc.


4-4

Attempted solution for 4-4 part (d): $ T(n) = 3T(n/3+5)+n/2 $

We use the iteration method. Start with recursion tree:

  • Root node: $ \frac{n}{2} $
  • First level: $ 3\frac{\frac{n}{3}+5}{2} $
  • Second level: $ 9\frac{\frac{n}{3}+5}{4} $
  • ith level: $ \left(\frac{3}{2}\right)^i\left(\frac{n}{3}+5\right) $

Note: above is not correct

$ \left(\frac{n}{3}+5\right)\sum{\left(\frac{3}{2}\right)^i} $


Randomization (and prob 5.3-3)

As we've seen, Permute-With-All does not produce a uniform random permutation. Curious to see how it affects the distribution of permutations? Here's an experiment with the erroneous randomization algorithm: False randomize

In the solution given for this problem, their argument is that $ n^n $ is not a multiple of $ n! $ for $ n\ge 3 $. Intuitively, $ n! $ for $ n\ge 3 $ includes more than one prime factor, namely 2 and 3, whereas $ n^n $ of course has only one.


Prob 5.4-5

Is there an intuitive explanation as to why the nested summations in the solution evaluate to a "combination"?

Alumni Liaison

Ph.D. on Applied Mathematics in Aug 2007. Involved on applications of image super-resolution to electron microscopy

Francisco Blanco-Silva