Line 22: Line 22:
 
They are equal because they describe the same set of elements, not because they have the same order.  
 
They are equal because they describe the same set of elements, not because they have the same order.  
 
:--[[User:Narupley|Nick Rupley]] 12:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 
:--[[User:Narupley|Nick Rupley]] 12:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
--J. Korb
 +
 +
Just wondering if anyone found a better way of doing this problem than writing out all the subgroups and ignoring the ones that are the same. It seems like there should be a cleaner way of doing this.

Latest revision as of 11:43, 5 February 2009


List the cyclic subgrous of U(30).

To do this, I listed each possible subgroup of U(30) and then tested whether they are cyclic. A problem I ran into, though, is that <13> appears to be cyclic and <23> does, but the answer in the back of the book does not include them.

Has anyone else encountered this problem or know the solution? I will try to ask during office hours....


--A. Cadwallader


I think they aren't in the back of the book because <13> is the same as <7> and <23> is the same as <17>.

--S. Rosenberger

Is <13> = <7> and <23> = 17 because they have the same elements or the same order. What I'm asking is if cyclic groups of the same order equal to each other.

--R. Kersey

They are equal because they describe the same set of elements, not because they have the same order.

--Nick Rupley 12:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

--J. Korb

Just wondering if anyone found a better way of doing this problem than writing out all the subgroups and ignoring the ones that are the same. It seems like there should be a cleaner way of doing this.

Alumni Liaison

Abstract algebra continues the conceptual developments of linear algebra, on an even grander scale.

Dr. Paul Garrett