(New page: Category:MA453Spring2009Walther For this problem, does anyone know what the new conjecture is supposed to be? I thought it might just be that the order of r multiplied by the order o...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:MA453Spring2009Walther]] | [[Category:MA453Spring2009Walther]] | ||
| − | For this problem, does anyone know what the new conjecture is supposed to be? I thought it might just be that the order of r multiplied by the order of s is NOT the order of rs, but I wasn't sure if there was another conjecture that could be made. | + | For this problem, does anyone know what the new conjecture is supposed to be? I thought it might just be that the order of r multiplied by the order of s is NOT the order of rs, but I wasn't sure if there was another conjecture that could be made. --[[User:Clwarner|Clwarner]] 21:14, 3 February 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:14, 3 February 2009
For this problem, does anyone know what the new conjecture is supposed to be? I thought it might just be that the order of r multiplied by the order of s is NOT the order of rs, but I wasn't sure if there was another conjecture that could be made. --Clwarner 21:14, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
