Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | =[[HW3_MA453Fall2008walther|HW3]], Chapter 3, Problem 40, [[MA453]], Fall 2008, [[user:walther|Prof. Walther]]= | ||
+ | ==Problem Statement== | ||
+ | ''Could somebody please state the problem?'' | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | ==Discussion== | ||
It seems to me that |U(r)| x |U(s)| x gcd(r,s) = |U(rs)|. All of the integers in Problem 38 had a gcd of 1, but 4 and 10 have a gcd of 2. I thought of a couple other examples that this works for (2 and 4 is a simple example that holds). | It seems to me that |U(r)| x |U(s)| x gcd(r,s) = |U(rs)|. All of the integers in Problem 38 had a gcd of 1, but 4 and 10 have a gcd of 2. I thought of a couple other examples that this works for (2 and 4 is a simple example that holds). | ||
Line 5: | Line 11: | ||
I thought that if Let U(r)=a U(s)=b if either one or both r or s is prime then |U(rs)|=2*(ab). Same thing you have but said differently | I thought that if Let U(r)=a U(s)=b if either one or both r or s is prime then |U(rs)|=2*(ab). Same thing you have but said differently | ||
Jenny | Jenny | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | [[HW3_MA453Fall2008walther|Back to HW3]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Main_Page_MA453Fall2008walther|Back to MA453 Fall 2008 Prof. Walther]] |
Latest revision as of 16:06, 22 October 2010
HW3, Chapter 3, Problem 40, MA453, Fall 2008, Prof. Walther
Problem Statement
Could somebody please state the problem?
Discussion
It seems to me that |U(r)| x |U(s)| x gcd(r,s) = |U(rs)|. All of the integers in Problem 38 had a gcd of 1, but 4 and 10 have a gcd of 2. I thought of a couple other examples that this works for (2 and 4 is a simple example that holds).
-DK
I thought that if Let U(r)=a U(s)=b if either one or both r or s is prime then |U(rs)|=2*(ab). Same thing you have but said differently Jenny