| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
-Wooi-Chen | -Wooi-Chen | ||
| + | |||
| + | ----- | ||
| + | I think if you prove its cyclic the inverse will always be the same | ||
| + | |||
| + | -Matt | ||
Revision as of 10:43, 17 September 2008
How do you prove that an element and its inverse have the same order? I understand the idea but do not know how to prove it.
-Wooi-Chen
I thought this worked as a proof.
$ g^k=1 $ element g having order of k
$ (g^k)^{-1}=(1)^{-1} $
$ g^{-k}=1 $
$ (g^{-1})^k=1 $ inverse of g having order of k
This could be wrong, but it makes sense.
-Daniel
That actually makes sense to me as well. It is kind of playing with the order which power comes, that's the idea I get.
-Wooi-Chen
I think if you prove its cyclic the inverse will always be the same
-Matt
