(New page: For problem 2 I think a) [i] P(one lost on A,one lost on B)=2!(1/5)(1-1/5)(1/16) [ii] P(both lost on B)=[(1-1/5)^2]*(1/16) [iii] P(both lost on A)=(1/5)^2 I don't really understand...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
For problem 2
 
For problem 2
 
I think
 
I think
a) [i] P(one lost on A,one lost on B)=2!(1/5)(1-1/5)(1/16)
+
a)  
  [ii] P(both lost on B)=[(1-1/5)^2]*(1/16)
+
[i] P(one lost on A,one lost on B)=2!(1/5)(1-1/5)(1/16)
  [iii] P(both lost on A)=(1/5)^2
+
[ii] P(both lost on B)=[(1-1/5)^2]*(1/16)
 +
[iii] P(both lost on A)=(1/5)^2
  
  
 
I don't really understand the solutiong they give, but i dont really think the solution for a)[ii] is correct. The P for one case lost in B is 1/16, how can lost both in B even higher than lost one?
 
I don't really understand the solutiong they give, but i dont really think the solution for a)[ii] is correct. The P for one case lost in B is 1/16, how can lost both in B even higher than lost one?

Revision as of 15:50, 24 September 2008

For problem 2 I think a) [i] P(one lost on A,one lost on B)=2!(1/5)(1-1/5)(1/16) [ii] P(both lost on B)=[(1-1/5)^2]*(1/16) [iii] P(both lost on A)=(1/5)^2


I don't really understand the solutiong they give, but i dont really think the solution for a)[ii] is correct. The P for one case lost in B is 1/16, how can lost both in B even higher than lost one?

Alumni Liaison

Ph.D. on Applied Mathematics in Aug 2007. Involved on applications of image super-resolution to electron microscopy

Francisco Blanco-Silva