| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
[[Image:ct_ECE301Fall2008mboutin.jpg]] | [[Image:ct_ECE301Fall2008mboutin.jpg]] | ||
| + | sampled at 0.01 | ||
| + | [[Image:dt0_ECE301Fall2008mboutin.jpg]] | ||
| + | but converting it to DT and increasing the sampling rate to 0.08 shows a non-periodic set of points | ||
| − | + | [[Image:untitled_ECE301Fall2008mboutin.jpg]] | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
Revision as of 16:30, 11 September 2008
Periodic signal revisited
1. I am considering my example x=cos2t from 0 to 5pi used in the previous homework part 1.E.
sampled at 0.01
but converting it to DT and increasing the sampling rate to 0.08 shows a non-periodic set of points
