(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
= [[:Category:Problem solving|Practice Problem]]: compute the zero-th order moment of a Gaussian random variable =
+
= [[:Category:Problem solving|Practice Problem]]: compute the first order moment of a Gaussian random variable =
  
 
----
 
----
Line 28: Line 28:
  
 
<math>E[X^{1}]=\int_{-\infty }^{\infty }xf_{X}(x)dx=\frac{1}{3\sqrt{2\Pi }}\int_{-\infty }^{\infty }xe^{-\frac{(x-3)^{2}}{18}}dx=\frac{1}{3\sqrt{2\Pi }}9\sqrt{2\Pi }=3</math>  
 
<math>E[X^{1}]=\int_{-\infty }^{\infty }xf_{X}(x)dx=\frac{1}{3\sqrt{2\Pi }}\int_{-\infty }^{\infty }xe^{-\frac{(x-3)^{2}}{18}}dx=\frac{1}{3\sqrt{2\Pi }}9\sqrt{2\Pi }=3</math>  
 +
----
 +
===Comment on Answer 1===
 +
<span style="color:blue">I have seen 'E(x^n) is defined as:'</span>
  
<span style="color:red">I have seen 'E(x^n) is defined as:'</span>
+
<math>{\color{blue} E[X^{n}]=\int_{-\infty }^{\infty }x^{n}f_{X}(x)dx \;\;\; (1)}</math>
  
<math>E[X^{n}]=\int_{-\infty }^{\infty }x^{n}f_{X}(x)dx \;\;\; (1)</math>
+
<span style="color:blue">in a few of the hmwrk 5 answers.  However, I think there's an important distinction between equivalency and definition.  E(x^n) is not defined as (1); it is only E(x) that is defined as</span>
  
<span style="color:red">in a few of the hmwrk 5 answers.  However, I think there's an important distinction between equivalency and definition.  E(x^n) is not defined as (1); it is only E(x) that is defined as</span>
+
<math>{\color{blue} E[X]=\int_{-\infty }^{\infty }xf_{X}(x)dx \;\;\; (2)}</math>
  
<math>E[X]=\int_{-\infty }^{\infty }xf_{X}(x)dx \;\;\; (2)</math>
+
<span style="color:blue">E(x^n) happens to equal (1) by way of the more general fact that</span>
  
<span style="color:red">E(x^n) happens to equal (1) by way of the more general fact that</span>
+
<math>{\color{blue} E[g(X)]=\int_{-\infty }^{\infty }g(X)f_{X}(x)dx \;\;\; (3)}</math>
  
<math>E[g(X)]=\int_{-\infty }^{\infty }g(X)f_{X}(x)dx \;\;\; (3)</math>
+
<span style="color:blue">See pgs 84-85 from Bertsekas and Tsitsiklis to see why. -ag</span>
 
+
<span style="color:red">See pgs 84-85 from Bertsekas and Tsitsiklis to see why. -ag</span>
+
  
 +
:<span style="color:green">Instructor's comment: You are correct ag, I couldn't have said it better. I appreciate your attention to details. -pm </span>
 +
----
 +
===Another comment on Answer 1===
 +
<span style="color:green">Did you figure out the integral "by hand" or did you just plug it into a symbolic conputation software? You will need to be able to integrate by hand on the test.  -pm </span>
 
=== Answer 2 ===
 
=== Answer 2 ===
  

Latest revision as of 13:00, 25 March 2013

Practice Problem: compute the first order moment of a Gaussian random variable


A random variable X has the following probability density function:

$ f_X (x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi} 3 } e^{\frac{-(x-3)^2}{18}} . $

Compute the moment of order one of that random variable. In other words, compute

$ E \left( X^1 \right) . $


Share your answers below

You will receive feedback from your instructor and TA directly on this page. Other students are welcome to comment/discuss/point out mistakes/ask questions too!


Answer 1

The moment of n-th order moment is defined as: $ E[X^{n}]=\int_{-\infty }^{\infty }x^{n}f_{X}(x)dx $

Therefore,

$ E[X^{1}]=\int_{-\infty }^{\infty }xf_{X}(x)dx=\frac{1}{3\sqrt{2\Pi }}\int_{-\infty }^{\infty }xe^{-\frac{(x-3)^{2}}{18}}dx=\frac{1}{3\sqrt{2\Pi }}9\sqrt{2\Pi }=3 $


Comment on Answer 1

I have seen 'E(x^n) is defined as:'

$ {\color{blue} E[X^{n}]=\int_{-\infty }^{\infty }x^{n}f_{X}(x)dx \;\;\; (1)} $

in a few of the hmwrk 5 answers. However, I think there's an important distinction between equivalency and definition. E(x^n) is not defined as (1); it is only E(x) that is defined as

$ {\color{blue} E[X]=\int_{-\infty }^{\infty }xf_{X}(x)dx \;\;\; (2)} $

E(x^n) happens to equal (1) by way of the more general fact that

$ {\color{blue} E[g(X)]=\int_{-\infty }^{\infty }g(X)f_{X}(x)dx \;\;\; (3)} $

See pgs 84-85 from Bertsekas and Tsitsiklis to see why. -ag

Instructor's comment: You are correct ag, I couldn't have said it better. I appreciate your attention to details. -pm

Another comment on Answer 1

Did you figure out the integral "by hand" or did you just plug it into a symbolic conputation software? You will need to be able to integrate by hand on the test. -pm

Answer 2

Write it here.

Answer 3

Write it here.


Back to ECE302 Spring 2013 Prof. Boutin

Back to ECE302

Alumni Liaison

Abstract algebra continues the conceptual developments of linear algebra, on an even grander scale.

Dr. Paul Garrett