(New page: This is very similar to example 11 on page 379: Since it explicitly says "No simple close formula exists for this number [indistinguishable objects and indistinguishable boxes]," the best...) |
|||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This is very similar to example 11 on page 379: | This is very similar to example 11 on page 379: | ||
− | Since it explicitly says "No simple | + | Since it explicitly says "No simple closed formula exists for this number [indistinguishable objects and indistinguishable boxes]," the best way to go about the problem is simply list the solutions. |
<div style="font-family: Courier;"> | <div style="font-family: Courier;"> | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
So, the answer is 5. | So, the answer is 5. | ||
+ | |||
+ | --[[User:Djallen|Djallen]] 19:17, 24 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Comments: | ||
+ | |||
+ | This solution is correct; although it is very interesting that counting something like this has no closed formula especially since the problem is very general. | ||
+ | |||
+ | --[[User:ysuo|ysuo]] 23:47, 5 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | This is a very good answer. I like the way you organized the work. Very well done. | ||
+ | |||
+ | --[[User:pstechsc|pstechsc]] 16:34, 6 October 2008 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 11:34, 6 October 2008
This is very similar to example 11 on page 379:
Since it explicitly says "No simple closed formula exists for this number [indistinguishable objects and indistinguishable boxes]," the best way to go about the problem is simply list the solutions.
Box 1: 5 4 3 3 2
Box 2: 0 1 1 2 2
Box 3: 0 0 1 0 1
So, the answer is 5.
--Djallen 19:17, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Comments:
This solution is correct; although it is very interesting that counting something like this has no closed formula especially since the problem is very general.
--ysuo 23:47, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
This is a very good answer. I like the way you organized the work. Very well done.
--pstechsc 16:34, 6 October 2008 (UTC)