| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | =[[Hw5ECE438F10|HW5]] Discussion, [[ECE438]], Fall 2010, Prof. Boutin= | ||
| + | Use this page to discuss the homework. Feel free to post your answers and discuss them here. --[[User:Mboutin|Mboutin]] 10:04, 27 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | ---- | ||
Any hints on how to start off 1b? | Any hints on how to start off 1b? | ||
| + | ::Look at the reconstruction in the Fourier domain. --[[User:Mboutin|Mboutin]] 10:04, 27 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | ---- | |
I don't understand what 2a) wants. Reconstruction signal?> Is that ... inverse sampling it? ~ajfunche | I don't understand what 2a) wants. Reconstruction signal?> Is that ... inverse sampling it? ~ajfunche | ||
| − | --- | + | ::If the words of the question sound unfamiliar to you, you absolutely have to read Sections 7.1 and 7.2 of Oppenheim-Willsky (the [[ECE301]] textbook). --[[User:Mboutin|Mboutin]] 10:04, 27 September 2010 (UTC) |
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | For question 2c, will the impulse response just be the convolution of a unit impulse with the transfer function ho(t) (given on pg 521 fig 7.7 of Oppenheim-Willsky)? | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Sort of. but this is a "convoluted" way to get the answer (pun intended). Think about it a little bit! --[[User:Mboutin|Mboutin]] 07:56, 29 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | [[Hw5ECE438F10|Back to HW5]] | ||
Latest revision as of 02:56, 29 September 2010
HW5 Discussion, ECE438, Fall 2010, Prof. Boutin
Use this page to discuss the homework. Feel free to post your answers and discuss them here. --Mboutin 10:04, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Any hints on how to start off 1b?
- Look at the reconstruction in the Fourier domain. --Mboutin 10:04, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
I don't understand what 2a) wants. Reconstruction signal?> Is that ... inverse sampling it? ~ajfunche
For question 2c, will the impulse response just be the convolution of a unit impulse with the transfer function ho(t) (given on pg 521 fig 7.7 of Oppenheim-Willsky)?
- Sort of. but this is a "convoluted" way to get the answer (pun intended). Think about it a little bit! --Mboutin 07:56, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
