(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 23: Line 23:
  
 
d) C(10,3) + C(10,4) + ... + C10,10)
 
d) C(10,3) + C(10,4) + ... + C10,10)
 +
 +
----
 +
this is also how i did it, but is there no other shorter way if the bit string was length 1000?
 +
 +
For part D, the other way to think about it, is how many combinations don't have atleast 3 1's, and subtract from total.  So you could start with 2^10 - C(10,2) - C(10,1) - C(10,0) and come up with the same answer.  Again, not much help if it's a 1000 length string and you want to know how many have atleast 400 1's.

Latest revision as of 10:21, 17 September 2008

How many strings of length 10 have.

a) exactly three 0s?

C(10,3) = 120


b) more 0s than 1s?

10 0s : C(10,10) = 1 9 0s : C(10,9) = 10 8 0s : C(10,8) = 45 7 0s : C(10,7) = 120 6 0s : C(10,6) = 210

Total = 386

Another way to solve this is by noting there are just as many strings with more 0s as 1s than more 1s than 0s. So take the number of all strings, subtract out the ones with 5 0s and 5 1s, and then divide by 2.


c) C(10,7) + C(10,8) + C(10,9) + C(10,10) = 176

d) C(10,3) + C(10,4) + ... + C10,10)


this is also how i did it, but is there no other shorter way if the bit string was length 1000?

For part D, the other way to think about it, is how many combinations don't have atleast 3 1's, and subtract from total. So you could start with 2^10 - C(10,2) - C(10,1) - C(10,0) and come up with the same answer. Again, not much help if it's a 1000 length string and you want to know how many have atleast 400 1's.

Alumni Liaison

Ph.D. on Applied Mathematics in Aug 2007. Involved on applications of image super-resolution to electron microscopy

Francisco Blanco-Silva