(New page: To ask a new question, put a line and type your question. You can use LaTeX to type math. Here is a link to a short LaTeX tutorial. To answer a question, open the page for editing and st...) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | To ask a new question, | + | To ask a new question, add a line and type in your question. You can use LaTeX to type math. Here is a link to a short |
| + | [http://www.csun.edu/~hcmth008/latex_help/latex_start.html LaTeX tutorial]. | ||
| + | |||
To answer a question, open the page for editing and start typing below the question... | To answer a question, open the page for editing and start typing below the question... | ||
| Line 5: | Line 7: | ||
[[ HomeworkDiscussionsMA341Spring2010 | go back to the Discussion Page ]] | [[ HomeworkDiscussionsMA341Spring2010 | go back to the Discussion Page ]] | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | If there is a closed interval I = [a,b] then is it appropriate to assume that b = supI and a = infI ? Does it need to be shown? because I'm not sure it is written explicitly anywhere. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | '''Prof. Alekseenko:''' It is actually a theorem that <math> b=\sup{(a,b)} </math> and <math> a=\inf{(a,b)} </math>. You may assume that this theorem is given, however, it seems unusual that you need a statement like that. Intervals are rather simple. Do we have to use <math> \sup </math> and <math> \inf </math> on them? | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | I don't think we need to say sup and inf, because they are the end points and nothing in the interval can be larger or smaller than b and a, respectively. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Prof. Alekseenko:''' I agree. As a rule of thumb, <math> \sup </math> and <math> \inf </math> are used when you are not given the particular points bounding the set below and above. So that we have to use the fact that <math> \sup </math> and <math> \inf </math> for the set exist and that the <math> \sup </math> and <math> \inf </math> define the boundary points. When the boundary points of the set are given to us, for example, the limits of the interval <math>(a,b)\,</math> usually, we do not need to "re-invent" them. | ||
Latest revision as of 10:45, 17 February 2010
To ask a new question, add a line and type in your question. You can use LaTeX to type math. Here is a link to a short LaTeX tutorial.
To answer a question, open the page for editing and start typing below the question...
go back to the Discussion Page
If there is a closed interval I = [a,b] then is it appropriate to assume that b = supI and a = infI ? Does it need to be shown? because I'm not sure it is written explicitly anywhere.
Prof. Alekseenko: It is actually a theorem that $ b=\sup{(a,b)} $ and $ a=\inf{(a,b)} $. You may assume that this theorem is given, however, it seems unusual that you need a statement like that. Intervals are rather simple. Do we have to use $ \sup $ and $ \inf $ on them?
I don't think we need to say sup and inf, because they are the end points and nothing in the interval can be larger or smaller than b and a, respectively.
Prof. Alekseenko: I agree. As a rule of thumb, $ \sup $ and $ \inf $ are used when you are not given the particular points bounding the set below and above. So that we have to use the fact that $ \sup $ and $ \inf $ for the set exist and that the $ \sup $ and $ \inf $ define the boundary points. When the boundary points of the set are given to us, for example, the limits of the interval $ (a,b)\, $ usually, we do not need to "re-invent" them.
