((C))
((C))
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
V(t) = the integral of Pi*[e^(-x)]^2 dx from 0 to t
 
V(t) = the integral of Pi*[e^(-x)]^2 dx from 0 to t
  
Just evaluate the integrals:
+
Just evaluate the integrals to get:
  
A(t) = -e^-t + 1
+
<math>A(t)=-e^{-t}+1</math>
  
 
and
 
and
  
V(t) = -(1/2)*Pi*e^-2x + Pi/2
+
<math>V(t) = -(Pi*e^{-2x})/2 + Pi/2</math>
  
 
and then take the limits as t approaches infinity.
 
and then take the limits as t approaches infinity.
Line 23: Line 23:
  
 
== (C) ==
 
== (C) ==
 +
I'm not sure about this part..
  
Just factor the top of the equation like this: (e^(-2t) - 1) into (e^(-t) + 1)*(e^(-t) - 1)
+
[[User:Idryg|Idryg]] 21:03, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
  
Then you can cancel some terms and there you go.
 
 
[[User:Idryg|Idryg]] 21:02, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 
  
 
On part C, since e^a is valid for all real a, and since V(0) and A(0) are valid functions (i.e. V(0) does not give a no solution), the limit as t approaches zero from the right is the same as if t approaches infinity from the left. This means that you can just take the limit as t approaches 0 and ignore the 0+ aspect of the problem.  
 
On part C, since e^a is valid for all real a, and since V(0) and A(0) are valid functions (i.e. V(0) does not give a no solution), the limit as t approaches zero from the right is the same as if t approaches infinity from the left. This means that you can just take the limit as t approaches 0 and ignore the 0+ aspect of the problem.  
 
I am not %100 sure about this, but this is how I understood the problem, maybe if someone graphs this, we can see what V(t)/A(t) is approaching when t = 0. --[[User:Ctuchek|Ctuchek]] 21:13, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 
I am not %100 sure about this, but this is how I understood the problem, maybe if someone graphs this, we can see what V(t)/A(t) is approaching when t = 0. --[[User:Ctuchek|Ctuchek]] 21:13, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 +
 +
 +
Just factor the top of the equation like this: <math>(e^{-2t} - 1)</math> into <math>(e^{-t} + 1)(e^{-t} - 1)</math>
 +
 +
Then you can cancel some terms and there you go.
 +
 +
[[User:Idryg|Idryg]] 21:14, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 +
 +
Hmmm.  I bet that works.  But maybe L'Hopital's could be useful here.  --[[User:Bell|Bell]] 21:39, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 17:31, 6 October 2008

(A)

So you know:

A(t) = the integral of e^(-x) dx from 0 to t

and

V(t) = the integral of Pi*[e^(-x)]^2 dx from 0 to t

Just evaluate the integrals to get:

$ A(t)=-e^{-t}+1 $

and

$ V(t) = -(Pi*e^{-2x})/2 + Pi/2 $

and then take the limits as t approaches infinity.

(B)

Just put V(t) over A(t) and take the limits.

(C)

I'm not sure about this part..

Idryg 21:03, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


On part C, since e^a is valid for all real a, and since V(0) and A(0) are valid functions (i.e. V(0) does not give a no solution), the limit as t approaches zero from the right is the same as if t approaches infinity from the left. This means that you can just take the limit as t approaches 0 and ignore the 0+ aspect of the problem. I am not %100 sure about this, but this is how I understood the problem, maybe if someone graphs this, we can see what V(t)/A(t) is approaching when t = 0. --Ctuchek 21:13, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


Just factor the top of the equation like this: $ (e^{-2t} - 1) $ into $ (e^{-t} + 1)(e^{-t} - 1) $

Then you can cancel some terms and there you go.

Idryg 21:14, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Hmmm. I bet that works. But maybe L'Hopital's could be useful here. --Bell 21:39, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Alumni Liaison

Have a piece of advice for Purdue students? Share it through Rhea!

Alumni Liaison