| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:ECE302Spring2009chihw]] | [[Category:ECE302Spring2009chihw]] | ||
| − | + | Alright I know that problem 1 is easy cause you just have to integrate out the y for fx(x) and integrate out the x for fy(y)...BUT integrating out the y is horrible. i know its a uv - integral of vdu...but the original expression stays...so i subtracted it over to the other side and divided by the (1 + 1/(1+x) that remained. Is that the right avenue to go? cause it seems crazy but mathematically I think it works -- Cory | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | I know this is really late to post a response to this, but just in case anyone is randomly looking around here like I was, that is perfectly okay mathematically to do. It's really the only good way I know of integrating something multiplied by a sin, cos (or any exponential for that matter). --Matt | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
Latest revision as of 10:53, 1 April 2009
Alright I know that problem 1 is easy cause you just have to integrate out the y for fx(x) and integrate out the x for fy(y)...BUT integrating out the y is horrible. i know its a uv - integral of vdu...but the original expression stays...so i subtracted it over to the other side and divided by the (1 + 1/(1+x) that remained. Is that the right avenue to go? cause it seems crazy but mathematically I think it works -- Cory
I know this is really late to post a response to this, but just in case anyone is randomly looking around here like I was, that is perfectly okay mathematically to do. It's really the only good way I know of integrating something multiplied by a sin, cos (or any exponential for that matter). --Matt
