(New page: The conjecture I found after doing parts (a), (b), and (c) was that |U(r)|*|U(s)| = |U(r*s)|.<br>--~~~~)
 
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
[[Category:MA453Spring2009Walther]]
 +
 
The conjecture I found after doing parts (a), (b), and (c) was that |U(r)|*|U(s)| = |U(r*s)|.<br>--[[User:Jniederh|Jniederh]] 19:40, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 
The conjecture I found after doing parts (a), (b), and (c) was that |U(r)|*|U(s)| = |U(r*s)|.<br>--[[User:Jniederh|Jniederh]] 19:40, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
 +
Ya as long as they are rel. prime --[[User:Aifrank|Aifrank]] 00:07, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:10, 4 February 2009


The conjecture I found after doing parts (a), (b), and (c) was that |U(r)|*|U(s)| = |U(r*s)|.
--Jniederh 19:40, 4 February 2009 (UTC)


Ya as long as they are rel. prime --Aifrank 00:07, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Alumni Liaison

Correspondence Chess Grandmaster and Purdue Alumni

Prof. Dan Fleetwood