(New page: Choose 13 real numbers <math>x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_{13}\in\mathbb{R}</math> with <math>x_i\neq x_j</math> if <math>i\neq j</math>. For these 13 numbers there exist at least two numbers amongst ...)
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
[[Category:MA453Spring2009Walther]]
 
Choose 13 real numbers <math>x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_{13}\in\mathbb{R}</math> with <math>x_i\neq x_j</math> if <math>i\neq j</math>. For these 13 numbers there exist at least two numbers amongst them such that
 
Choose 13 real numbers <math>x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_{13}\in\mathbb{R}</math> with <math>x_i\neq x_j</math> if <math>i\neq j</math>. For these 13 numbers there exist at least two numbers amongst them such that
  
Line 5: Line 6:
 
It's a tricky one to prove, unless you are one endowed with a certain amount of intuition (exempli gratia, Uli, et alii). Simple trigonometry and the ever overlooked Pigeonhole Principle are key tools to solving it.
 
It's a tricky one to prove, unless you are one endowed with a certain amount of intuition (exempli gratia, Uli, et alii). Simple trigonometry and the ever overlooked Pigeonhole Principle are key tools to solving it.
  
:--[[User:Narupley|Narupley]] 10:13, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
+
:--[[User:Narupley|Nick Rupley]] 10:13, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 05:15, 18 January 2009

Choose 13 real numbers $ x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_{13}\in\mathbb{R} $ with $ x_i\neq x_j $ if $ i\neq j $. For these 13 numbers there exist at least two numbers amongst them such that

$ 0 < \frac{x_i-x_j}{1+x_ix_j} \leq 2-\sqrt{3} $

It's a tricky one to prove, unless you are one endowed with a certain amount of intuition (exempli gratia, Uli, et alii). Simple trigonometry and the ever overlooked Pigeonhole Principle are key tools to solving it.

--Nick Rupley 10:13, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Alumni Liaison

Ph.D. on Applied Mathematics in Aug 2007. Involved on applications of image super-resolution to electron microscopy

Francisco Blanco-Silva