(New page: It seems to me that |U(r)| x |U(s)| x gcd(r,s) = |U(rs)|. All of the integers in Problem 38 had a gcd of 1, but 4 and 10 have a gcd of 2. I thought of a couple other examples that this w...)
 
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
=[[HW3_MA453Fall2008walther|HW3]], Chapter 3, Problem 40, [[MA453]], Fall 2008, [[user:walther|Prof. Walther]]=
 +
==Problem Statement==
 +
''Could somebody please state the problem?''
 +
 +
----
 +
==Discussion==
 
It seems to me that |U(r)| x |U(s)| x gcd(r,s) = |U(rs)|.  All of the integers in Problem 38 had a gcd of 1, but 4 and 10 have a gcd of 2.  I thought of a couple other examples that this works for (2 and 4 is a simple example that holds).
 
It seems to me that |U(r)| x |U(s)| x gcd(r,s) = |U(rs)|.  All of the integers in Problem 38 had a gcd of 1, but 4 and 10 have a gcd of 2.  I thought of a couple other examples that this works for (2 and 4 is a simple example that holds).
  
 
-DK
 
-DK
 +
---------------
 +
I thought that if Let U(r)=a U(s)=b if either one or both r or s is prime then |U(rs)|=2*(ab). Same thing you have but said differently
 +
Jenny
 +
----
 +
[[HW3_MA453Fall2008walther|Back to HW3]]
 +
 +
[[Main_Page_MA453Fall2008walther|Back to MA453 Fall 2008 Prof. Walther]]

Latest revision as of 16:06, 22 October 2010

HW3, Chapter 3, Problem 40, MA453, Fall 2008, Prof. Walther

Problem Statement

Could somebody please state the problem?


Discussion

It seems to me that |U(r)| x |U(s)| x gcd(r,s) = |U(rs)|. All of the integers in Problem 38 had a gcd of 1, but 4 and 10 have a gcd of 2. I thought of a couple other examples that this works for (2 and 4 is a simple example that holds).

-DK


I thought that if Let U(r)=a U(s)=b if either one or both r or s is prime then |U(rs)|=2*(ab). Same thing you have but said differently Jenny


Back to HW3

Back to MA453 Fall 2008 Prof. Walther

Alumni Liaison

Questions/answers with a recent ECE grad

Ryne Rayburn