(New page: Your answer is pretty good. I liked how it was to-the-point yet informative. It is pretty awesome, just shy of how awesome mine is. -Virgil Hsieh)
 
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Your answer is pretty good. I liked how it was to-the-point yet informative. It is pretty awesome, just shy of how awesome mine is. -Virgil Hsieh
 
Your answer is pretty good. I liked how it was to-the-point yet informative. It is pretty awesome, just shy of how awesome mine is. -Virgil Hsieh
 +
 +
I like your examples and your consideration of all cases of input signals x(t) (including non-bounded ones).  Your definitions get the point across, though saying <math>|x(t)| < \epsilon </math> isn't technically correct, assuming you mean <math>\epsilon</math> to be a real constant.  (One should say <math>\forall t \in \mathbb{R}, |x(t)| < \epsilon </math>.)  -Brian Thomas
 +
 +
Very clear answer,  I had no problem understanding the wording. As far as I know it was correct.
 +
-Collin Phillips
 +
 +
The answers are short and effective.  It is also very well laid out.  I also enjoyed the examples.  They bring real world situations into play. --Justin Kietzman
 +
 +
Your explanation is concise along with practical examples that help illustrate the point. -Hang Zhang
 +
 +
Good explanation, the examples following were a nice touch. - Kevin Hoyt

Latest revision as of 12:49, 19 September 2008

Your answer is pretty good. I liked how it was to-the-point yet informative. It is pretty awesome, just shy of how awesome mine is. -Virgil Hsieh

I like your examples and your consideration of all cases of input signals x(t) (including non-bounded ones). Your definitions get the point across, though saying $ |x(t)| < \epsilon $ isn't technically correct, assuming you mean $ \epsilon $ to be a real constant. (One should say $ \forall t \in \mathbb{R}, |x(t)| < \epsilon $.) -Brian Thomas

Very clear answer, I had no problem understanding the wording. As far as I know it was correct. -Collin Phillips

The answers are short and effective. It is also very well laid out. I also enjoyed the examples. They bring real world situations into play. --Justin Kietzman

Your explanation is concise along with practical examples that help illustrate the point. -Hang Zhang

Good explanation, the examples following were a nice touch. - Kevin Hoyt

Alumni Liaison

Abstract algebra continues the conceptual developments of linear algebra, on an even grander scale.

Dr. Paul Garrett