(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
=== Defining <math>e</math> ===
 
=== Defining <math>e</math> ===
  
There are a number of constants in mathematics that are defined by geometry. For example, Archimedes's constant <math>\pi</math> is defined as the ratio between the circumference and diameter of a circle. Pythagoras's constant <math>\sqrt2</math> is defined as the length of the diagonal of a square with sides of 1. Unlike these constants, however, <math>e</math> is more easily defined using formulas.
+
There are a number of constants in mathematics that are defined by geometry. For example, Archimedes's constant <math>\pi</math> is defined as the ratio between the circumference and diameter of a circle. Pythagoras's constant <math>\sqrt2</math> is defined as the length of the diagonal of a square with sides of 1. Unlike these constants, however, <math>e</math> is more easily expressed through limits and formulas.
  
The formula we are concerned with is the one for compounding interest:
+
 
 +
Let us consider the formula for compounding interest:
  
 
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
 
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
Line 13: Line 14:
 
and <math>n</math> is the number of times the interest is compounded. To make analysis simpler, we'll set <math> P = r = 1 </math> and <math> t = n </math>.
 
and <math>n</math> is the number of times the interest is compounded. To make analysis simpler, we'll set <math> P = r = 1 </math> and <math> t = n </math>.
  
Let's observe what happens to the value of <math>P'</math> when different values of <math>n</math> are used:
+
 
 +
Let us observe what happens to the value of <math>P'</math> when different values of <math>n</math> are used:
  
 
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
 
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
Line 25: Line 27:
 
\end{array}</math>
 
\end{array}</math>
  
As can be seen from the table, the value of the formula seems to approach some number. The number that this sequence approaches is called <math>e</math>. We can extract a limit to define <math> e </math> from the formula for P':
+
 
 +
By careful analysis of this table, it can be seen that value of this formula seems to approach some number. The number that this sequence approaches is called <math>e</math>. From this, we can extract a limit that can be used to express <math> e </math> from the formula for P':
  
 
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
 
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
Line 32: Line 35:
 
\end{align}</math>
 
\end{align}</math>
  
Leonhard Euler was the one who defined this constant with the symbol ''e'' in one of his papers in 1731. The agreed upon theory is that he named the number ''e'' not after himself but because it was the next letter in the variables he was using.
+
Leonhard Euler was the one who defined this constant using the symbol ''e'' in a paper he wrote in 1731. Surprisingly, the agreed upon theory is that he named the number ''e'' not after himself but because it was the next letter in the variables he was using.
  
In his study of the number, Euler found the following fractional expansion for <math> e </math>:
+
 
 +
Upon further study of this constant, Euler found the following fractional expansion for <math> e </math>:
  
 
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
 
&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
Line 42: Line 46:
  
 
With coefficients <math> 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 4, 1, 1, 6, 1, 1, \cdots, 1, 2n, 1, \cdots </math>. He used this expansion to show that the number is irrational.
 
With coefficients <math> 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 4, 1, 1, 6, 1, 1, \cdots, 1, 2n, 1, \cdots </math>. He used this expansion to show that the number is irrational.
 +
  
 
He was later able to find the first 18 digits of <math> e </math> using a different formula he came up with to define the number. This particular formula was based on the Taylor Series of <math> e^x </math>:
 
He was later able to find the first 18 digits of <math> e </math> using a different formula he came up with to define the number. This particular formula was based on the Taylor Series of <math> e^x </math>:
Line 52: Line 57:
 
Obviously, evaluating this series at <math>x = 1</math> yields approximations of <math> e </math>. This method of calculating <math> e </math> is much easier to work out by hand than the initial formula based on compounding interest as it does not require taking large powers of already long fractions.
 
Obviously, evaluating this series at <math>x = 1</math> yields approximations of <math> e </math>. This method of calculating <math> e </math> is much easier to work out by hand than the initial formula based on compounding interest as it does not require taking large powers of already long fractions.
  
'''References''' <br />
+
 
Maor, E. (1994). ''E: The Story of a Number.'' Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Retrieved from http://webwork.utleon.edu.mx/Paginas/Libros/E%20-%20The%20Story%20of%20a%20Number.pdf <br />
+
 
 +
<big>References</big><br>
 +
 
 
Haran, B. [Numberphile]. (2016, December 19). ''e (Euler's Number) - Numberphile'' [Video File]. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/AuA2EAgAegE <br />
 
Haran, B. [Numberphile]. (2016, December 19). ''e (Euler's Number) - Numberphile'' [Video File]. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/AuA2EAgAegE <br />
Sýkora, S. (2008, March 31). Mathematical Constants and Sequences. In ''Mathematical Constants and Sequences''. Retrieved from http://www.ebyte.it/library/educards/constants/MathConstants.html <br />
+
Maor, E. (1994). ''E: The Story of a Number.'' Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Retrieved from http://webwork.utleon.edu.mx/Paginas/Libros/E%20-%20The%20Story%20of%20a%20Number.pdf <br />
 
O'Connor, J. J., & Robertson, E. F. (2001, September). The number e. Retrieved from http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/HistTopics/e.html <br />
 
O'Connor, J. J., & Robertson, E. F. (2001, September). The number e. Retrieved from http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/HistTopics/e.html <br />
 
Sandifer, E. (2006, February). How Euler Did It. Retrieved from http://eulerarchive.maa.org/hedi/HEDI-2006-02.pdf
 
Sandifer, E. (2006, February). How Euler Did It. Retrieved from http://eulerarchive.maa.org/hedi/HEDI-2006-02.pdf
 +
Sýkora, S. (2008, March 31). Mathematical Constants and Sequences. In ''Mathematical Constants and Sequences''. Retrieved from http://www.ebyte.it/library/educards/constants/MathConstants.html <br />
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
[[Walther_MA279_Fall2018_topic3|Back to Mysteries of the Number e]]
 
[[Category:MA279Fall2018Walther]]
 
[[Category:MA279Fall2018Walther]]

Latest revision as of 23:54, 2 December 2018

Defining $ e $

There are a number of constants in mathematics that are defined by geometry. For example, Archimedes's constant $ \pi $ is defined as the ratio between the circumference and diameter of a circle. Pythagoras's constant $ \sqrt2 $ is defined as the length of the diagonal of a square with sides of 1. Unlike these constants, however, $ e $ is more easily expressed through limits and formulas.


Let us consider the formula for compounding interest:

                $ \begin{align} P' = P\left(1+\frac rn\right)^t \end{align} $

Where $ P $ is initial principle, $ P $ is final principle, $ r $ is the interest rate, and $ n $ is the number of times the interest is compounded. To make analysis simpler, we'll set $ P = r = 1 $ and $ t = n $.


Let us observe what happens to the value of $ P' $ when different values of $ n $ are used:

                $ \begin{array}{|c|c|}\hline n & P'\\\hline 5 & 2.48832\\\hline 50 & 2.69159\\\hline 100 & 2.70481\\\hline 100,000 & 2.71827\\\hline 1,000,000 & 2.71828\\\hline \end{array} $


By careful analysis of this table, it can be seen that value of this formula seems to approach some number. The number that this sequence approaches is called $ e $. From this, we can extract a limit that can be used to express $ e $ from the formula for P':

                $ \begin{align} e := \lim_{n\to\infty} \left(1+\frac1n\right)^n \end{align} $

Leonhard Euler was the one who defined this constant using the symbol e in a paper he wrote in 1731. Surprisingly, the agreed upon theory is that he named the number e not after himself but because it was the next letter in the variables he was using.


Upon further study of this constant, Euler found the following fractional expansion for $ e $:

                $ \begin{align} e = 2 + \frac1{1 + \frac1{2 + \frac1{1+\frac1{1+\frac1{4 + \ddots}}}}} \end{align} $

With coefficients $ 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 4, 1, 1, 6, 1, 1, \cdots, 1, 2n, 1, \cdots $. He used this expansion to show that the number is irrational.


He was later able to find the first 18 digits of $ e $ using a different formula he came up with to define the number. This particular formula was based on the Taylor Series of $ e^x $:

                $ \begin{align} e^x = \sum^{\infty}_{n=0}{\frac{x^n}{n!}} = 1 + x + \frac{x^2}2 + \frac{x^3}6 + \cdots \end{align} $

Obviously, evaluating this series at $ x = 1 $ yields approximations of $ e $. This method of calculating $ e $ is much easier to work out by hand than the initial formula based on compounding interest as it does not require taking large powers of already long fractions.


References

Haran, B. [Numberphile]. (2016, December 19). e (Euler's Number) - Numberphile [Video File]. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/AuA2EAgAegE
Maor, E. (1994). E: The Story of a Number. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Retrieved from http://webwork.utleon.edu.mx/Paginas/Libros/E%20-%20The%20Story%20of%20a%20Number.pdf
O'Connor, J. J., & Robertson, E. F. (2001, September). The number e. Retrieved from http://www-history.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/HistTopics/e.html
Sandifer, E. (2006, February). How Euler Did It. Retrieved from http://eulerarchive.maa.org/hedi/HEDI-2006-02.pdf Sýkora, S. (2008, March 31). Mathematical Constants and Sequences. In Mathematical Constants and Sequences. Retrieved from http://www.ebyte.it/library/educards/constants/MathConstants.html



Back to Mysteries of the Number e

Alumni Liaison

has a message for current ECE438 students.

Sean Hu, ECE PhD 2009